Evidence consistently shows that almond consumption beneficially affects lipids and lipoproteins. Almonds, however, have not been evaluated in a controlled-feeding setting using a diet design with only a single, calorie-matched food substitution to assess their specific effects on cardiometabolic risk factors.

Background Several lipid-lowering therapies reduce CRP (C-reactive protein) independently of LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) reduction, but the association between CRP parameters and benefits from more-intensive LDL-C lowering is inconclusive. We aimed to determine whether the benefits of more- versus less-intensive LDL-C lowering on cardiovascular events related to baseline, achieved, or magnitude of reduction in CRP concentrations. Methods and Results PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched through July 2, 2018. We included randomized controlled cardiovascular outcome trials of LDL-C lowering with statins or ezetimibe. Two reviewers independently extracted study data and rated study quality. Data were analyzed using meta-analysis and metaregression analysis. Rate ratios of mortality and cardiovascular outcomes associated with baseline, achieved, and magnitude reduction of CRP concentration were calculated. Twenty-four trials were included, with 171 250 patients randomly assigned to more- or less-intensive LDL-C-lowering treatments. Median follow-up duration was 4.2 years. More-intensive LDL-C lowering resulted in a significant reduction in incidences of all outcomes. Compared with less-intensive LDL-C lowering, more-intensive LDL-C lowering was associated with less reductions in myocardial infarction with a higher baseline CRP concentration (change in rate ratios per 1-mg/L increase in log-transformed CRP, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.22; P=0.007]), but not other outcomes. Similar risk reductions occurred for more- versus less-intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy regardless of the magnitude of CRP reduction or the achieved CRP level for all outcomes. Conclusions Baseline CRP concentrations might be associated with the benefits of LDL-C lowering on myocardial infarction, but no other outcomes, whereas the achieved and magnitude of reduction in CRP did not seem to have an important association.

Background Bempedoic acid (BA) inhibits ATP-citrate lyase in the cholesterol synthesis pathway and lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). As with other lipid-lowering therapies, interindividual variation in response to BA was observed in clinical trials. We characterized LDL-C response to BA using guideline-defined statin intensity categories and identified clinical factors associated with enhanced LDL-C lowering with BA. Methods and Results This post hoc analysis used pooled data from 4 phase 3 studies. Patients were randomized 2:1 to once-daily BA 180 mg (n=2321) or placebo (n=1167) for 12 to 52 weeks and grouped based on percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 12 according to guideline-established statin intensity categories. Factors associated with ≥30% reduction in LDL-C were identified using logistic regression analyses. From baseline to week 12, BA lowered LDL-C levels comparable to a moderate- or high-intensity statin (≥30%) in 28.9% of patients; this degree of LDL-C lowering was observed in 50.9% of patients not receiving background statin therapy. In a multivariable analysis, the absence of statins, female sex, a history of diabetes, ezetimibe use, and higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level were associated with increased rates of achieving ≥30% LDL-C reduction with BA (P<0.01 for each). Conclusions A large percentage of patients receiving BA achieved LDL-C reductions comparable to a moderate- or high-intensity statin. Factors including statin absence, female sex, diabetes history, ezetimibe use, and a higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level may be useful to identify patients who may have a greater LDL-C reduction with BA. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT02666664, NCT02991118, NCT02988115, NCT03001076.

Apheresis is an important treatment for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We systematically reviewed the current literature surrounding LDL-C apheresis for FH.

Background Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors and rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease outcomes vary across racial/ethnic groups. This analysis examined the effects of evolocumab on LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) levels and LDL-C goals achievement by race/ethnicity. Methods and Results Data from 15 phase 2 and 3 studies of treatment with evolocumab versus placebo or ezetimibe were pooled (n=7669). Results were analyzed by participant clinical characteristics and by self-identified race/ethnicity. Key outcomes included percent change from baseline in LDL-C, achievement of LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and LDL-C reduction of ≥50% at 12 weeks and at 1 to 5 years. Across 12-week studies, mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline in evolocumab-treated participants was -52% to -59% for White and -46% to -67% for non-White participants, across clinical characteristics groups. LDL-C <70 mg/dL was achieved in 43% to 84% and 62% to 94% and LDL-C reduction of ≥50% in 63% to 78% and 58% to 86%, respectively. In 1- to 5-year studies, mean percent change in LDL-C was -46% to -52% for White and -49% to -55% for non-White participants. LDL-C <70 mg/dL was achieved in 53% to 84% and 66% to 77%, and LDL-C reduction of ≥50% in 53% to 67% and 58% to 68%, respectively. The treatment effect on mean percent change in LDL-C differed only in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with a larger reduction in Asian participants. The qualitative interaction P values were nonsignificant, indicating consistent directionality of effect. Conclusions Similar reduction in LDL-C levels with evolocumab was observed across racial/ethnic groups in 12-week and 1- to 5-year studies. Among those with diabetes mellitus, Asian participants had greater LDL-C reduction.

Levels of LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol in the population are declining, and increasing attention is being focused on residual lipid-related pathways of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk beyond LDL cholesterol. Among individuals with low (<130 mg/dL) LDL cholesterol, we undertook detailed profiling of circulating atherogenic lipoproteins in relation to incident cardiovascular disease in 2 populations.

Background Beyond their potent LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol ( LDL -C)-lowering efficacy (50-60%), PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitors also reduce Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) levels by 25% to 30%, suggesting a 2:1 response ratio. We aimed to characterize the relationship between LDL -C and Lp(a) lowering by evolocumab, a PCSK 9 inhibitor, in a large clinical trial population and to determine the prevalence of concordant/discordant LDL -C and Lp(a) responses to PCSK 9 inhibition. Methods and Results Data were analyzed from 4 randomized, 12-week, multicenter, phase 3 evolocumab trials. Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia, or statin intolerance participated in the trials. The main measure was the degree of concordance or discordance of LDL -C and Lp(a) in response to PCSK 9 inhibition; concordant response was defined as LDL -C reduction >35% and Lp(a) reduction >10%. The study cohort comprised 895 patients (438 female; median age: 59.0 years [interquartile range: 51-66 years]). Baseline mean level of LDL -C was 133.6 mg/dL (SE: 1.7) and median Lp(a) level was 46.4 mg/dL (interquartile range: 18.4-82.4 mg/dL). A discordant response was observed in 165 (19.7%) patients. With these cutoffs, the prevalence of discordance was higher when considering baseline Lp(a) concentrations >30 mg/dL (26.5%) or >50 mg/dL (28.6%). Conclusions We demonstrate high prevalence of discordance in LDL -C and Lp(a) reduction in response to evolocumab, particularly when considering higher baseline Lp(a) concentrations, indicating the possibility of alternative pathways beyond LDLR ( LDL receptor)-mediated clearance involved in Lp(a) reduction by evolocumab. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT 01763827, NCT 01763866, NCT 01763905, NCT 01763918.

Background Elevated plasma levels of alpha-aminoadipic acid (2-AAA) have been associated with the development of type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis. However, the nature of the association remains unknown. Methods and Results We identified genetic determinants of plasma 2-AAA through meta-analysis of genome-wide association study data in 5456 individuals of European, African, and Asian ancestry from the Framingham Heart Study, Diabetes Prevention Program, Jackson Heart Study, and Shanghai Women's and Men's Health Studies. No single nucleotide polymorphisms reached genome-wide significance across all samples. However, the top associations from the meta-analysis included single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the known 2-AAA pathway gene DHTKD1, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes involved in mitochondrial respiration (NDUFS4) and macrophage function (MSR1). We used a Mendelian randomization instrumental variable approach to evaluate relationships between 2-AAA and cardiometabolic phenotypes in large disease genome-wide association studies. Mendelian randomization identified a suggestive inverse association between increased 2-AAA and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P=0.005). We further characterized the genetically predicted relationship through measurement of plasma 2-AAA and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in 2 separate samples of individuals with and without cardiometabolic disease (N=98), and confirmed a significant negative correlation between 2-AAA and high-density lipoprotein (rs=-0.53, P<0.0001). Conclusions 2-AAA levels in plasma may be regulated, in part, by common variants in genes involved in mitochondrial and macrophage function. Elevated plasma 2-AAA associates with reduced levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Further mechanistic studies are required to probe this as a possible mechanism linking 2-AAA to future cardiometabolic risk.

Potent anti-inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments are associated with reduced cardiovascular risk as well as increases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. This apparent paradox may be explained by favorable changes in other lipid measurements. The objective of this study was to determine the longitudinal association between changes in inflammation with advanced lipoprotein measurements and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol efflux capacity.

Background Information on the real-world use of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 inhibitors (PCKS9is) in familial hypercholesterolemia are limited. We evaluated the pattern of prescription and the long-term efficacy of alirocumab and evolocumab in Italian patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in clinical practice. Methods and Results The data set for analysis was extracted from the PCKS9i Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) registry and included 2484 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and 62 patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) who were prescribed PCKS9is from February 2017 to December 2021. As the follow-up schedules were not prespecified and could vary, persistence and adherence as well as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) changes during 2 years of treatment were analyzed in a final cohort of 1299 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. At baseline, 53.8% of patients with HeFH and 69.4% of patients with HoFH were receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapies, while 45.9% of patients with HeFH and 30.7% of patients with HoFH reported statin intolerance; mean LDL-C was 197.7±52.3 mg/dL in HeFH and 252.0±106.2 mg/dL in HoFH. The 6-month persistence and adherence to therapy were >85%, and LDL-C reduction reached 58.6% (to 79.7 mg/dL) in HeFH and 57.6% (to 95.1 mg/dL) in HoFH after 24 months of treatment. The European Atherosclerosis Society/European Society of Cardiology LDL-C goals were achieved in 43.3% of patients with HeFH and 37.5% of patients with HoFH. Conclusions PCKS9i prescribed to patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in clinical practice showed LDL-C-lowering efficacy similar to that observed in controlled trials. However, 2 of 5 HeFH cases and 2 of 6 HoFH cases achieved the recommended LDL-C goals. The full achievement of European Atherosclerosis Society/European Society of Cardiology LDL-C goals should require a lower threshold for PCKS9i initiation and a combination of multiple therapies.

Background Real-world data on low baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and long-term postdischarge cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome are limited. Methods and Results Of the 10 719 patients enrolled in the Korean registry of acute myocardial infarction between January 2004 and August 2014, we identified 5532 patients who were event free from death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or stroke during the in-hospital period after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. The co-primary outcomes were 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death) and cardiovascular death at 5 years. Of 5532 patients with acute myocardial infarction (mean age, 62.1±12.8 years; 75.0% men), 446 cardiovascular deaths (8.1%) and 695 three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (12.6%) occurred at 5 years. In the continuous analysis of LDL-C, the risk of cardiovascular events increased steeply as LDL-C levels decreased from 100 mg/dL. For categorical analysis of LDL-C (<70, 70-99, and ≥100 mg/dL), as LDL-C levels decreased, clinical outcomes worsened (237/3759 [6.3%] in LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL versus 123/1291 [9.5%] in LDL-C 70-99 mg/dL versus 86/482 [17.8%] in LDL-C <70 mg/dL for cardiovascular death; P-trend<0.001; and 417/3759 [11.1%] in LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL versus 172/1291 [13.3%] in LDL-C 70-99 mg/dL versus 106/482 [22.2%] in LDL-C <70 mg/dL for 3-point major adverse cardiovascular event; P-trend<0.001). In a Cox time-to-event multivariable model with LDL-C levels ≥100 mg/dL as the reference, the baseline LDL-C level <70 mg/dL was independently associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.30-2.17]) and 3-point major adverse cardiovascular event (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.10-1.71]). Conclusions In this Korean acute myocardial infarction registry, the baseline LDL-C level <70 mg/dL was significantly associated with an increased incidence of long-term cardiovascular events after discharge. (COREA [Cardiovascular Risk and Identification of Potential High-Risk Population]-Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry; NCT02806102). Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT02806102.

Background Elevated lipoprotein(a) is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease but is not measured in routine clinical care. Screening of high lipoprotein(a) in individuals with moderate elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) may identify individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results We examined 2606 Framingham Offspring participants (median age, 54 years; 45% men) prospectively with a median follow-up of 15 years (n=392 incident cardiovascular events). Individuals with higher (≥100 nmol/L) versus lower lipoprotein(a) were divided into groups based on LDL-C <135 mg/dL versus ≥135 mg/dL. In Cox models, after adjustment for known risk factors, high lipoprotein(a) (≥100 nmol/L) and LDL-C ≥135 mg/dL were each significant predictors of cardiovascular disease (LDL-C ≥135 mg/dL: hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.64; P=0.006; high lipoprotein (a): HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.66; P=0.026). Across the groups of high/low lipoprotein (a) and LDL-C ≥135 mg/dL or <135 mg/dL, the absolute cardiovascular disease risks at 15 years were 22.6% (high lipoprotein(a)/LDL-C ≥135 mg/dL, n=248), 17.3% (low lipoprotein(a)/LDL-C ≥135 mg/dL, n=758), 12.7% (high lipoprotein(a)/LDL-C <135 mg/dL, n=275) and 11.5% (low lipoprotein(a)/LDL-C <135 mg/dL, n=1328, reference group). Among individuals with LDL-C ≥135 mg/dL, those with high lipoprotein(a) had a 43% higher risk (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.05-1.97; P=0.02). Presence of high lipoprotein(a) with moderate LDL-C levels (135-159 mg/dL) yielded absolute risks equivalent to those with LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL (23.5%, 95% CI, 17.4%-31.3%; and 20.7%, 95% CI, 16.8%-25.3%, respectively). Conclusions Concomitant elevation of LDL-C ≥135 mg/dL and lipoprotein(a) ≥100 nmol/L is associated with a high absolute risk of incident cardiovascular disease. lipoprotein(a) measurement in individuals with moderate elevations in LDL-C, who do not otherwise meet criteria for statins, may identify individuals at high cardiovascular risk.

Current recommendations for lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) focus on the control of other risk factors, including lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with little evidence to support this approach. Identifying interactions between Lp(a) and other risk factors could identify individuals at increased risk for Lp(a)-mediated disease.

Background Recent trials have shown that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <1.80 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL) is associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in White patients with ischemic stroke with atherosclerosis. However, it remains uncertain whether the findings can be generalized to Asian patients, or that similar LDL-C targets should be adopted in patients with stroke without significant atherosclerosis. Methods and Results We performed a prospective cohort study and recruited consecutive Chinese patients with ischemic stroke with magnetic resonance angiography of the intra- and cervicocranial arteries performed at the University of Hong Kong between 2008 and 2014. Serial postevent LDL-C measurements were obtained. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with mean postevent LDL-C <1.80 versus ≥1.80 mmol/L, stratified by presence or absence of significant (≥50%) large-artery disease (LAD) and by ischemic stroke subtypes, were compared. Nine hundred four patients (mean age, 69±12 years; 60% men) were followed up for a mean 6.5±2.4 years (mean, 9±5 LDL-C readings per patient). Regardless of LAD status, patients with a mean postevent LDL-C <1.80 mmol/L were associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (with significant LAD: multivariable-adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.99; without significant LAD: subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88) (both P<0.05). Similar findings were noted in patients with ischemic stroke attributable to large-artery atherosclerosis (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28-0.84) and in patients with other ischemic stroke subtypes (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95) (both P<0.05). Conclusions A mean LDL-C <1.80 mmol/L was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in Chinese patients with ischemic stroke with and without significant LAD. Further randomized trials to determine the optimal LDL-C cutoff in stroke patients without significant atherosclerosis are warranted.

Background Current cholesterol guidelines have recommended very low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment targets for people at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, recent observational studies indicated that very low LDL-C levels may be associated with increased mortality and other adverse outcomes. The association between LDL-C levels and long-term risk of overall and cardiovascular mortality among the U.S. general population remains to be determined. Methods and Results This prospective cohort study included a nationally representative sample of 14 035 adults aged 18 years or older, who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III 1988-1994. LDL-C levels were divided into 6 categories: <70, 70-99.9, 100-129.9, 130-159.9, 160-189.9 and ≥190 mg/dL. Deaths and underlying causes of deaths were ascertained by linkage to death records through December 31, 2015. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) of mortality outcomes and its 95% CIs. During 304 025 person-years of follow up (median follow-up 23.2 years), 4458 deaths occurred including 1243 deaths from CVD. At baseline, mean age was 41.5 years and 51.9% were women. Very low and very high levels of LDL-C were associated with increased mortality. After adjustment for age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, C-reactive protein, body mass index, and other cardiovascular risk factors, individuals with LDL-C<70 mg/dL, compared to those with LDL-C 100-129.9 mg/dL, had HRs of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.10-1.93) for all-cause mortality, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.01-2.54) for CVD mortality, and 4.04 (95% CI, 1.83-8.89) for stroke-specific mortality, but no increased risk of coronary heart disease mortality. Compared with those with LDL-C 100-129.9 mg/dL, individuals with LDL-C≥190 mg/dL had HRs of 1.49 (95% CI, 1.09-2.02) for CVD mortality, and 1.63 (95% CI, 1.12-2.39) for coronary heart disease mortality, but no increased risk of stroke mortality. Conclusions Both very low and very high LDL-C levels were associated with increased risks of CVD mortality. Very low LDL-C levels was also associated with the high risks of all-cause and stroke mortality. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the optimal range of LDL-C levels for CVD health in the general population.

Background The relationship between lowering LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol with contemporary lipid-lowering therapies and incident diabetes mellitus ( DM ) remains uncertain. Methods and Results Thirty-three randomized controlled trials (21 of statins, 12 of PCSK9 [proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9] inhibitors, and 0 of ezetimibe) were selected using Medline , Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception through November 15, 2018). A total of 163 688 nondiabetic patients were randomly assigned to more intensive (83 123 patients) or less intensive (80 565 patients) lipid-lowering therapy. More intensive lipid-lowering therapy was defined as the more potent pharmacological strategy ( PCSK 9 inhibitors, higher intensity statins, or statins), whereas less intensive therapy corresponded to active control group or placebo/usual care of the trial. Metaregression and meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. No significant association was noted between 1-mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol and incident DM for more intensive lipid-lowering therapy (risk ratio: 0.95; 95% CI , 0.87-1.04; P=0.30; R2=14%) or for statins or PCSK 9 inhibitors. More intensive lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a higher risk of incident DM compared with less intensive therapy (risk ratio: 1.07; 95% CI , 1.03-1.11; P<0.001; I2=0%). These results were driven by higher risk of incident DM with statins (risk ratio: 1.10; 95% CI , 1.05-1.15; P<0.001; I2=0%), whereas PCSK 9 inhibitors were not associated with incident DM (risk ratio: 1.00; 95% CI , 0.93-1.07; P=0.96; I2=0%; P=0.02 for interaction). Conclusions Among intensive lipid-lowering therapies, there was no independent association between reduction in LDL cholesterol and incident DM . The risk of incident DM was higher with statins, whereas PCSK 9 inhibitors had no association with risk of incident DM .

Background Dyslipidemia guidelines recommend non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) as additional targets of therapy and consider lipoprotein(a) a significant cardiovascular risk marker. The current analysis evaluates the effects of evolocumab on these parameters in various patient populations over time. Methods and Results Data from 7690 patients, 4943 of whom received at least 1 dose of evolocumab, in 15 phase 2 and phase 3 studies with a duration ranging from 12 weeks to 5 years were pooled based on study length, patient population, and ezetimibe or placebo comparator groups. Patients could receive intensive statin therapy but not in the statin intolerance and monotherapy studies. The effects of evolocumab on percent change from baseline for non-HDL-C, ApoB, and lipoprotein(a) and achievement of treatment goals for non-HDL-C and ApoB were examined. Compared with placebo, evolocumab at both approved dosing regimens substantially reduced mean non-HDL-C (Q2W dose: -49% to -56%, monthly dose: -48% to -52%), mean ApoB (Q2W dose: -46% to -52%, monthly dose: -40% to -48%), and median lipoprotein(a) (Q2W dose: -22% to -38%, monthly dose: -20% to -33%) at 12 weeks. Effects on all 3 parameters persisted over 5 years. Lipid-lowering effects were consistent among the patient populations examined (hypercholesterolemia/mixed dyslipidemia, statin intolerance, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus). Conclusions In this pooled analysis, evolocumab substantially reduced non-HDL-C, ApoB, and lipoprotein(a) compared with placebo. The effect was consistent and maintained in various patient populations over 5 years.

Background The Hp (haptoglobin)2-2 phenotype (~40% of people) is associated with dysfunctional high-density lipoprotein (HDL) that is heavily oxidized in hyperglycemia, which may explain why raising HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) does not reliably prevent coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetes. Methods and Results In this observational study using longitudinal data from the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) lipid trial, time-varying (achieved) HDL-C updated at 4, 8, and 12 months, and annually thereafter over a mean of 4.7 years, was analyzed in relation to risk of CAD and secondary outcomes using Cox proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariables among participants with (n=1781) and without (n=3191) the Hp2-2 phenotype. HDL-C did not differ between the phenotypes throughout the study. Having low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL for male participants and <50 mg/dL for female participants) was associated with a greater risk of CAD compared with non-low HDL-C among participants with the non-Hp2-2 phenotype (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48 [95% CI, 1.18-1.87]) but not among the Hp2-2 phenotype (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.70-1.35]; P interaction=0.03). Similarly, an inverse relationship was observed between HDL-C quintiles and CAD risk among participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype, whereas no significant inverse relationship was observed among participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype (P interaction=0.38). Among the Hp2-2 phenotype group, having low HDL-C was associated with higher risk of CVD mortality (HR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.05-4.13]), and compared with the lowest HDL-C quintile, higher quintiles were associated with lower risk of CVD mortality and congestive heart failure. Conclusions Hp phenotype modified the association between HDL-C and risk of CAD in the ACCORD lipid study, suggesting that HDL dysfunction in the Hp2-2 phenotype may hinder CAD-protective properties of HDL-C.

Background The function of high-density lipoprotein can change from protective to proatherosclerotic under inflammatory conditions. Herein, we studied whether inflammation could modify the relationship between high-density lipoprotein level and risk of adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease . Methods and Results In total, 1864 patients from the prospective KNOW-CKD (Korean Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease) were enrolled. The main predictor was high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level. Presence of inflammation was defined by hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) level of ≥1.0 mg/L. The primary outcome was extended major adverse cardiovascular events. During 9231.2 person-years of follow-up, overall incidence of the primary outcome was 15.8 per 1000 person-years. In multivariable Cox analysis after adjusting for confounders, HDL-C level was not associated with the primary outcome. There was a significant interaction between the inflammatory status and HDL-C for risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular events (P=0.003). In patients without inflammation, the hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) for HDL-C levels <40, 50 to 59, and ≥60 mg/dL were 1.10 (0.50-1.82), 0.95 (0.50-1.82), and 0.42 (0.19-0.95), respectively, compared with HDL-C of 40 to 49 mg/dL. However, the significant association for HDL-C ≥60 mg/dL was not seen after Bonferroni correction. In patients with inflammation, we observed a trend toward increased risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular events in higher HDL-C groups (HRs [95% CIs], 0.73 [0.37-1.43], 1.24 [0.59-2.61], and 1.56 [0.71-3.45], respectively), but without statistical significance. Conclusions The association between HDL-C level and adverse cardiovascular outcomes showed reverse trends based on inflammation status in Korean patients with chronic kidney disease. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01630486.

Foam cell formation by intimal smooth muscle cells (SMCs) inhibits the elaboration of extracellular matrix, which is detrimental to plaque stabilization. In the present study, we examined the lipoproteins and receptors involved in human SMC foam cell formation and investigated the ability of 24(S),25-epoxycholesterol [24(S),25-EC], an oxysterol agonist of the liver X receptor, to attenuate SMC foam cell formation.