2024MAY10: Our hosting provider is experiencing intermittent networking issues. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Searching across hundreds of databases

Our searching services are busy right now. Your search will reload in five seconds.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

This service exclusively searches for literature that cites resources. Please be aware that the total number of searchable documents is limited to those containing RRIDs and does not include all open-access literature.

Search

Type in a keyword to search

On page 1 showing 1 ~ 7 papers out of 7 papers

In vivo Visualization of Pig Vagus Nerve "Vagotopy" Using Ultrasound.

  • Megan L Settell‎ et al.
  • Frontiers in neuroscience‎
  • 2021‎

Background: Placement of the clinical vagus nerve stimulating cuff is a standard surgical procedure based on anatomical landmarks, with limited patient specificity in terms of fascicular organization or vagal anatomy. As such, the therapeutic effects are generally limited by unwanted side effects of neck muscle contractions, demonstrated by previous studies to result from stimulation of (1) motor fibers near the cuff in the superior laryngeal and (2) motor fibers within the cuff projecting to the recurrent laryngeal. Objective: Conventional non-invasive ultrasound, where the transducer is placed on the surface of the skin, has been previously used to visualize the vagus with respect to other landmarks such as the carotid and internal jugular vein. However, it lacks sufficient resolution to provide details about the vagus fascicular organization, or detail about smaller neural structures such as the recurrent and superior laryngeal branch responsible for therapy limiting side effects. Here, we characterize the use of ultrasound with the transducer placed in the surgical pocket to improve resolution without adding significant additional risk to the surgical procedure in the pig model. Methods: Ultrasound images were obtained from a point of known functional organization at the nodose ganglia to the point of placement of stimulating electrodes within the surgical window. Naïve volunteers with minimal training were then asked to use these ultrasound videos to trace afferent groupings of fascicles from the nodose to their location within the surgical window where a stimulating cuff would normally be placed. Volunteers were asked to select a location for epineural electrode placement away from the fascicles containing efferent motor nerves responsible for therapy limiting side effects. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of the ultrasound were directly compared to post-mortem histology in the same animals. Results: High-resolution ultrasound from the surgical pocket enabled 2-D and 3-D reconstruction of the cervical vagus and surrounding structures that accurately depicted the functional vagotopy of the pig vagus nerve as confirmed via histology. Although resolution was not sufficient to match specific fascicles between ultrasound and histology 1 to 1, it was sufficient to trace fascicle groupings from a point of known functional organization at the nodose ganglia to their locations within the surgical window at stimulating electrode placement. Naïve volunteers were able place an electrode proximal to the sensory afferent grouping of fascicles and away from the motor nerve efferent grouping of fascicles in each subject (n = 3). Conclusion: The surgical pocket itself provides a unique opportunity to obtain higher resolution ultrasound images of neural targets responsible for intended therapeutic effect and limiting off-target effects. We demonstrate the increase in resolution is sufficient to aid patient-specific electrode placement to optimize outcomes. This simple technique could be easily adopted for multiple neuromodulation targets to better understand how patient specific anatomy impacts functional outcomes.


Fibers in smaller fascicles have lower activation thresholds with cuff electrodes due to thinner perineurium and smaller cross-sectional area.

  • Christopher J Davis‎ et al.
  • Journal of neural engineering‎
  • 2023‎

Objective. In nerve stimulation therapies, fibers in larger fascicles generally have higher activation thresholds, but the mechanisms are not well understood. We implemented and analyzed computational models to uncover the effects of morphological parameters on activation thresholds.Approach. We implemented finite element models of human vagus nerve stimulation to quantify the effects of morphological parameters on thresholds in realistic nerves. We also implemented simplified models to isolate effects of perineurium thickness, endoneurium diameter, fiber diameter, and fascicle location on current density, potential distributions (Ve), and activation thresholds across cuff geometries and stimulation waveforms. UsingVefrom each finite element model, we simulated activation thresholds in biophysical cable models of mammalian axons.Main results. Perineurium thickness increases with fascicle diameter, and both thicker perineurium and larger endoneurial diameter contributed to higher activation thresholds via lower peak and broader longitudinal potentials. Thicker perineurium caused less current to enter the fascicle transversely, decreasing peakVe. Thicker perineurium also inhibited current from leaving the fascicle, causing more constant longitudinal current density, broadeningVe. With increasing endoneurial diameter, intrafascicular volume increased faster than surface area, thereby decreasing intrafascicular current density and peakVe. Additionally, larger fascicles have greater cross-sectional area, thereby facilitating longitudinal intrafascicular current flow and broadeningVe. A large neighboring fascicle could increase activation thresholds, and for a given fascicle, fiber diameter had the greatest effect on thresholds, followed by fascicle diameter, and lastly, fascicle location within the epineurium. The circumneural cuff elicited robust activation across the nerve, whereas a bipolar transverse cuff with small contacts delivering a pseudo-monophasic waveform enabled more selective activation across fiber diameters and locations.Significance. Our computational studies provide mechanistic understanding of neural responses across relevant morphological parameters of peripheral nerves, thereby informing rational design of effective therapies.


Functional vagotopy in the cervical vagus nerve of the domestic pig: implications for the study of vagus nerve stimulation.

  • Megan L Settell‎ et al.
  • Journal of neural engineering‎
  • 2020‎

Given current clinical interest in vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), there are surprisingly few studies characterizing the anatomy of the vagus nerve in large animal models as it pertains to on-and off-target engagement of local fibers. We sought to address this gap by evaluating vagal anatomy in the pig, whose vagus nerve organization and size approximates the human vagus nerve.


Spatially selective stimulation of the pig vagus nerve to modulate target effect versus side effect.

  • Stephan L Blanz‎ et al.
  • Journal of neural engineering‎
  • 2023‎

Electrical stimulation of the cervical vagus nerve using implanted electrodes (VNS) is FDA-approved for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy, treatment-resistant depression, and most recently, chronic ischemic stroke rehabilitation. However, VNS is critically limited by the unwanted stimulation of nearby neck muscles-a result of non-specific stimulation activating motor nerve fibers within the vagus. Prior studies suggested that precise placement of small epineural electrodes can modify VNS therapeutic effects, such as cardiac responses. However, it remains unclear if placement can alter the balance between intended effect and limiting side effect. We used an FDA investigational device exemption approved six-contact epineural cuff to deliver VNS in pigs and quantified how epineural electrode location impacts on- and off-target VNS activation. Detailed post-mortem histology was conducted to understand how the underlying neuroanatomy impacts observed functional responses. Here we report the discovery and characterization of clear neuroanatomy-dependent differences in threshold and saturation for responses related to both effect (change in heart rate) and side effect (neck muscle contractions). The histological and electrophysiological data were used to develop and validate subject-specific computation models of VNS, creating a well-grounded quantitative framework to optimize electrode location-specific activation of nerve fibers governing intended effect versus unwanted side effect.


Corrigendum: Functional vagotopy in the cervical vagus nerve of the domestic pig: implications for the study of vagus nerve stimulation (2020J. Neural Eng.17 026022).

  • Megan L Settell‎ et al.
  • Journal of neural engineering‎
  • 2021‎

No abstract available


Validated computational models predict vagus nerve stimulation thresholds in preclinical animals and humans.

  • Eric D Musselman‎ et al.
  • Journal of neural engineering‎
  • 2023‎

Objective.We demonstrated how automated simulations to characterize electrical nerve thresholds, a recently published open-source software for modeling stimulation of peripheral nerves, can be applied to simulate accurately nerve responses to electrical stimulation.Approach.We simulated vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for humans, pigs, and rats. We informed our models using histology from sample-specific or representative nerves, device design features (i.e. cuff, waveform), published material and tissue conductivities, and realistic fiber models.Main results.Despite large differences in nerve size, cuff geometry, and stimulation waveform, the models predicted accurate activation thresholds across species and myelinated fiber types. However, our C fiber model thresholds overestimated thresholds across pulse widths, suggesting that improved models of unmyelinated nerve fibers are needed. Our models of human VNS yielded accurate thresholds to activate laryngeal motor fibers and captured the inter-individual variability for both acute and chronic implants. For B fibers, our small-diameter fiber model underestimated threshold and saturation for pulse widths >0.25 ms. Our models of pig VNS consistently captured the range ofin vivothresholds across all measured nerve and physiological responses (i.e. heart rate, Aδ/B fibers, Aγfibers, electromyography, and Aαfibers). In rats, our smallest diameter myelinated fibers accurately predicted fast fiber thresholds across short and intermediate pulse widths; slow unmyelinated fiber thresholds overestimated thresholds across shorter pulse widths, but there was overlap for pulse widths >0.3 ms.Significance.We elevated standards for models of peripheral nerve stimulation in populations of models across species, which enabled us to model accurately nerve responses, demonstrate that individual-specific differences in nerve morphology produce variability in neural and physiological responses, and predict mechanisms of VNS therapeutic and side effects.


Quantified Morphology of the Cervical and Subdiaphragmatic Vagus Nerves of Human, Pig, and Rat.

  • Nicole A Pelot‎ et al.
  • Frontiers in neuroscience‎
  • 2020‎

It is necessary to understand the morphology of the vagus nerve (VN) to design and deliver effective and selective vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) because nerve morphology influences fiber responses to electrical stimulation. Specifically, nerve diameter (and thus, electrode-fiber distance), fascicle diameter, fascicular organization, and perineurium thickness all significantly affect the responses of nerve fibers to electrical signals delivered through a cuff electrode. We quantified the morphology of cervical and subdiaphragmatic VNs in humans, pigs, and rats: effective nerve diameter, number of fascicles, effective fascicle diameters, proportions of endoneurial, perineurial, and epineurial tissues, and perineurium thickness. The human and pig VNs were comparable sizes (∼2 mm cervically; ∼1.6 mm subdiaphragmatically), while the rat nerves were ten times smaller. The pig nerves had ten times more fascicles-and the fascicles were smaller-than in human nerves (47 vs. 7 fascicles cervically; 38 vs. 5 fascicles subdiaphragmatically). Comparing the cervical to the subdiaphragmatic VNs, the nerves and fascicles were larger at the cervical level for all species and there were more fascicles for pigs. Human morphology generally exhibited greater variability across samples than pigs and rats. A prior study of human somatic nerves indicated that the ratio of perineurium thickness to fascicle diameter was approximately constant across fascicle diameters. However, our data found thicker human and pig VN perineurium than those prior data: the VNs had thicker perineurium for larger fascicles and thicker perineurium normalized by fascicle diameter for smaller fascicles. Understanding these differences in VN morphology between preclinical models and the clinical target, as well as the variability across individuals of a species, is essential for designing suitable cuff electrodes and stimulation parameters and for informing translation of preclinical results to clinical application to advance the therapeutic efficacy of VNS.


  1. SciCrunch.org Resources

    Welcome to the FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org Resources search. From here you can search through a compilation of resources used by FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org and see how data is organized within our community.

  2. Navigation

    You are currently on the Community Resources tab looking through categories and sources that FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org has compiled. You can navigate through those categories from here or change to a different tab to execute your search through. Each tab gives a different perspective on data.

  3. Logging in and Registering

    If you have an account on FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org then you can log in from here to get additional features in FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org such as Collections, Saved Searches, and managing Resources.

  4. Searching

    Here is the search term that is being executed, you can type in anything you want to search for. Some tips to help searching:

    1. Use quotes around phrases you want to match exactly
    2. You can manually AND and OR terms to change how we search between words
    3. You can add "-" to terms to make sure no results return with that term in them (ex. Cerebellum -CA1)
    4. You can add "+" to terms to require they be in the data
    5. Using autocomplete specifies which branch of our semantics you with to search and can help refine your search
  5. Save Your Search

    You can save any searches you perform for quick access to later from here.

  6. Query Expansion

    We recognized your search term and included synonyms and inferred terms along side your term to help get the data you are looking for.

  7. Collections

    If you are logged into FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org you can add data records to your collections to create custom spreadsheets across multiple sources of data.

  8. Facets

    Here are the facets that you can filter your papers by.

  9. Options

    From here we'll present any options for the literature, such as exporting your current results.

  10. Further Questions

    If you have any further questions please check out our FAQs Page to ask questions and see our tutorials. Click this button to view this tutorial again.

Publications Per Year

X

Year:

Count: