Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Effects of fertilizer under different dripline spacings on summer maize in northern China.

Ge Li | Youlu Bai | Lei Wang | Yanli Lu | Jingjing Zhang | Yinjie Zhang
Scientific reports | 2021

Maximizing grain yields with effective fertilization technologies and minimizing nitrogen losses is essential in agroecosystems. In this research, we conducted a two-year field experiment to explore whether dripline spacing and fertilization rate would affect maize grain yield. Two dripline spacings (i.e., one drip line per row of maize with a row space of 60 cm and one drip line per two rows of maize) and two fertilization rates (i.e., high fertilization level: N, 180 kg ha-1; P2O5, 90 kg ha-1; and K2O, 90 kg ha-1 and low level: N, 139.5 kg ha-1; P2O5, 76.5 kg ha-1; and K2O, 76.5 kg ha-1) were employed in this research. The results showed that maize yield was significantly affected by both dripline spacing and fertilization rate. The maize yield was 10.2% higher in the treatment with one drip line per two rows than that in the treatment with one drip line per row. Maize yield increased by 10.9% at the high fertilization level compared to that at the low fertilization level. The quantity of cumulative ammonia volatilization was reduced by 15.1% with one drip line per two rows compared to that with one drip line per row, whereas it increased by 26.9% at the high fertilization level compared with that at the low fertilization level. These results indicated that one drip line per two rows with a high fertilization rate increased the yield and could reduce the environmental burden, which may be economically beneficial and environmentally sound for maize fertigation for green agricultural development.

Pubmed ID: 34556699

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Additional research tools detected in this publication

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


Origin (tool)

RRID:SCR_014212

Software application for data analysis and graphing. Origin contains a variety of different graph types, including statistical plots, 2D and 3D vector graphs, and counter graphs. More advance version is OriginPro which offers advanced analysis tools and Apps for Peak Fitting, Surface Fitting, Statistics and Signal Processing.

View all literature mentions

AutoCAD (tool)

RRID:SCR_021072

Software tool as computer aided design software that architects, engineers, and construction professionals rely on to create precise 2D and 3D drawings.

View all literature mentions