Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Predicting kinase inhibitors using bioactivity matrix derived informer sets.

Huikun Zhang | Spencer S Ericksen | Ching-Pei Lee | Gene E Ananiev | Nathan Wlodarchak | Peng Yu | Julie C Mitchell | Anthony Gitter | Stephen J Wright | F Michael Hoffmann | Scott A Wildman | Michael A Newton
PLoS computational biology | 2019

Prediction of compounds that are active against a desired biological target is a common step in drug discovery efforts. Virtual screening methods seek some active-enriched fraction of a library for experimental testing. Where data are too scarce to train supervised learning models for compound prioritization, initial screening must provide the necessary data. Commonly, such an initial library is selected on the basis of chemical diversity by some pseudo-random process (for example, the first few plates of a larger library) or by selecting an entire smaller library. These approaches may not produce a sufficient number or diversity of actives. An alternative approach is to select an informer set of screening compounds on the basis of chemogenomic information from previous testing of compounds against a large number of targets. We compare different ways of using chemogenomic data to choose a small informer set of compounds based on previously measured bioactivity data. We develop this Informer-Based-Ranking (IBR) approach using the Published Kinase Inhibitor Sets (PKIS) as the chemogenomic data to select the informer sets. We test the informer compounds on a target that is not part of the chemogenomic data, then predict the activity of the remaining compounds based on the experimental informer data and the chemogenomic data. Through new chemical screening experiments, we demonstrate the utility of IBR strategies in a prospective test on three kinase targets not included in the PKIS.

Pubmed ID: 31381559

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

  • Agency: NCI NIH HHS, United States
    Id: P30 CA014520
  • Agency: NIAID NIH HHS, United States
    Id: U54 AI117924

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


MATLAB (tool)

RRID:SCR_001622

Multi paradigm numerical computing environment and fourth generation programming language developed by MathWorks. Allows matrix manipulations, plotting of functions and data, implementation of algorithms, creation of user interfaces, and interfacing with programs written in other languages, including C, C++, Java, Fortran and Python. Used to explore and visualize ideas and collaborate across disciplines including signal and image processing, communications, control systems, and computational finance.

View all literature mentions

scikit-learn (tool)

RRID:SCR_002577

scikit-learn: machine learning in Python

View all literature mentions

Promega (tool)

RRID:SCR_006724

An Antibody supplier

View all literature mentions

Millipore (tool)

RRID:SCR_008983

An Antibody supplier

View all literature mentions