Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.
Background. Effective treatment methods are needed for moderate/severely impairment chronic stroke. Objective. The questions were the following: (1) Is there need for long-dose therapy or is there a mid-treatment plateau? (2) Are the observed gains from the prior-studied protocol retained after treatment? Methods. Single-blind, stratified/randomized design, with 3 applied technology treatment groups, combined with motor learning, for long-duration treatment (300 hours of treatment). Measures were Arm Motor Ability Test time and coordination-function (AMAT-T, AMAT-F, respectively), acquired pre-/posttreatment and 3-month follow-up (3moF/U); Fugl-Meyer (FM), acquired similarly with addition of mid-treatment. Findings. There was no group difference in treatment response (P ≥ .16), therefore data were combined for remaining analyses (n = 31; except for FM pre/mid/post, n = 36). Pre-to-Mid-treatment and Mid-to-Posttreatment gains of FM were statistically and clinically significant (P < .0001; 4.7 points and P < .001; 5.1 points, respectively), indicating no plateau at 150 hours and benefit of second half of treatment. From baseline to 3moF/U: (1) FM gains were twice the clinically significant benchmark, (2) AMAT-F gains were greater than clinically significant benchmark, and (3) there was statistically significant improvement in FM (P < .0001); AMAT-F (P < .0001); AMAT-T (P < .0001). These gains indicate retained clinically and statistically significant gains at 3moFU. From posttreatment to 3moF/U, gains on FM were maintained. There were statistically significant gains in AMAT-F (P = .0379) and AMAT-T P = .003.
Pubmed ID: 31131743
Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.
AMAT is a Matlab-based, open source interface for searching fMRI coordinates together with a simple database of coordinates. The AMAT database is deliberately designed to be minimal. Effectively, the database reproduces the tables of XYZ coordinates which are common in fMRI papers. Each coordinate is associated with the anatomical label given by the authors of the original paper, a ag for Talaraich or MNI coordinates, a very brief description of the description of the functional task or contrast which activated this coordinate, and the PubMed ID of the published paper. The latter links directly to the abstract in PubMed and allows the user to retrieve the original publication. Anatomical information labeling a coordinate as a particular Brodmann area or functional region is optional, and is normally only included if the authors of the original paper included these labels. No other information is stored.
View all literature mentions