Searching the Resource Information Network
Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.
Reviewer refusal is a phenomenon associated with different causes, including reviewer fatigue, lack of time, dissatisfaction with the editorial system, among other reasons. This article discusses the main factors involved in the reviewer refusal and the "peer-review crisis" from a broad perspective. In addition, reasons that make a researcher accept or not a review invitation are also described.
Pubmed ID: 32061827
Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.
A service resource which allows peer reviewers to record and showcase the peer reviews they have completed, both those that led to publication and to rejection. Peer reviews can be recorded on Publons by forwarding review receipts from journals to the site. The merit of reviewers is accrued by pre- and post-publication peer review, discussion papers in Publons, and comments on or endorsment of the contributions of other reviewers. Reviewers may publish their own reviews so long as the reviewed manuscript is published and the review policies of the journal allow for it. Users can choose what personal information is displayed and easily export their profile in a format suitable for inclusion in promotion and funding applications.
View all literature mentions