Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Asparagine Synthetase and Filamin A Have Different Roles in Ovarian Cancer.

Liang Zeng | Qiong Wang | Congmin Gu | Li Yuan | Xiaohui Xie | Lijuan He | Kai Chen | Pingping Tan | Lei Xue | Sanqian Huang | Kun Shi
Frontiers in oncology | 2019

Early-stage ovarian serous carcinoma is usually difficult to detect in clinical practice. The profiling of protein expression in high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) and low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) would provide important information for diagnoses and chemotherapy. Here, we performed proteomic profiling of specimens from 13 HGSC and 7 LGSC patients by iTRAQ. A total of 323 proteins that were differentially expressed were identified. After immunohistochemical confirmation of expressed proteins in 166 clinical tissues, asparagine synthetase (ASNS) and filamin A (FLNA) were selected for further functional study. Cisplatin-sensitive (CS; ASNShigh and FLNAlow) and cisplatin-resistant (CR; ASNSlow and FLNAhigh) SKOV3 and OVCAR3 ovarian cancer cell lines were used for subsequent in vitro and in vivo experiments. Notably, ASNS overexpression (ASNS+) or FLNA knockdown (shFLNA) enabled cisplatin-induced apoptosis and autophagy in CR cells. However, ASNS+ and shFLNA promoted and attenuated tumor growth, respectively. In CS cells, ASNS knockdown (shASNS) attenuated clonogenicity, cell proliferation, and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, whereas FLNA overexpression (FLNA+) protected cells from cisplatin. In vivo, cisplatin resistance was attenuated in mice xenografted with ASNS+, shFLNA, or ASNS+-shFLNA CR cells, whereas xenografts of shASNS or FLNA+ CS cells exhibited resistance to cisplatin. Clinically, all HGSC patients (83/83) responded to cisplatin, while 6 in 41 LGSC patients exhibited cisplatin resistance. These findings identify ASNS and FLNA as distinct biomarkers for HGSC and LGSC, which may have potential value in the prognosis and clinical treatment of serous carcinoma.

Pubmed ID: 31681605

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


IOSE-80 (tool)

RRID:CVCL_5546

Cell line IOSE-80 is a Transformed cell line with a species of origin Homo sapiens (Human)

View all literature mentions

SK-OV-3 (tool)

RRID:CVCL_0532

Cell line SK-OV-3 is a Cancer cell line with a species of origin Homo sapiens (Human)

View all literature mentions

HEK293T (tool)

RRID:CVCL_0063

Cell line HEK293T is a Transformed cell line with a species of origin Homo sapiens (Human)

View all literature mentions

BALB/cAnNCrl (tool)

RRID:MGI:2683685

laboratory mouse with name BALB/cAnNCrl from MGI.

View all literature mentions