Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Individual and joint performance of DNA methylation profiles, genetic risk score and environmental risk scores for predicting breast cancer risk.

Zhong Guan | Janhavi R Raut | Korbinian Weigl | Ben Schöttker | Bernd Holleczek | Yan Zhang | Hermann Brenner
Molecular oncology | 2020

DNA methylation patterns in the blood, genetic risk scores (GRSs), and environmental risk factors can potentially improve breast cancer (BC) risk prediction. We assessed the individual and joint predictive performance of methylation, GRS, and environmental risk factors for BC incidence in a prospective cohort study. In a cohort of 5462 women aged 50-75 from Germany, 101 BC cases were identified during 14 years of follow-up and were compared to 263 BC-free controls in a nested case-control design. Three previously suggested methylation risk scores (MRSs) based on methylation of 423, 248, and 131 cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) loci, and a GRS based on the risk alleles from 269 recently identified single nucleotide polymorphisms were constructed. Additionally, multiple previously proposed environmental risk scores (ERSs) were built based on environmental variables. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were estimated for evaluating BC risk prediction performance. MRS and ERS showed limited accuracy in predicting BC incidence, with AUCs ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 and from 0.52 to 0.59, respectively. The GRS predicted BC incidence with a higher accuracy (AUC = 0.61). Adjusted odds ratios per standard deviation increase (95% confidence interval) were 1.07 (0.84-1.36) and 1.40 (1.09-1.80) for the best performing MRS and ERS, respectively, and 1.48 (1.16-1.90) for the GRS. A full risk model combining the MRS, GRS, and ERS predicted BC incidence with the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.64) and might be useful for identifying high-risk populations for BC screening.

Pubmed ID: 31677238

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


PLINK (tool)

RRID:SCR_001757

Open source whole genome association analysis toolset, designed to perform range of basic, large scale analyses in computationally efficient manner. Used for analysis of genotype/phenotype data. Through integration with gPLINK and Haploview, there is some support for subsequent visualization, annotation and storage of results. PLINK 1.9 is improved and second generation of the software.

View all literature mentions

ESTHER (tool)

RRID:SCR_002621

Database and tools for analysis of protein and nucleic acid sequences belonging to superfamily of alpha/beta hydrolases homologous to cholinesterases. Covers multiple species, including human, mouse caenorhabditis and drosophila.

View all literature mentions

IMPUTE (tool)

RRID:SCR_009245

Software application for estimating (imputing) unobserved genotypes in SNP association studies. The program is designed to work seamlessly with the output of the genotype calling program CHIAMO and the population genetic simulator HAPGEN, and it produces output that can be analyzed using the program SNPTEST. (entry from Genetic Analysis Software)

View all literature mentions

GenomeStudio (tool)

RRID:SCR_010973

Visualize and analyze data generated by all of Illumina''s platforms.

View all literature mentions