Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.
This study aimed to research the understanding and knowledge of cervical cancer, human papilloma virus (HPV), and HPV vaccination, and the acceptance of HPV vaccination, among a population of women in northeastern China. A cross-sectional survey was carried out by questionnaire to investigate knowledge of cervical cancer, HPV, and HPV vaccination. The 230 female participants were native residents of northeastern China, and their ages ranged between 18 and 65 years. Questionnaires were randomly acquired by the respondents from online and paper questionnaire distribution. The questionnaire included questions on three major aspects to record people's perceptions of cervical cancer, HPV, and vaccines. Of the sample of 230 women surveyed, 80.9% had heard of cervical cancer, but understanding was only 15.7%; 38.3% knew about HPV; 20% knew about HPV vaccine; 39.6% agreed to receive HPV vaccination, and the remainder were mainly concerned about its safety and effectiveness. Data analysis showed that age, family income, and whether there was experience of screening all influenced knowledge of cervical cancer, but this was not statistically significant. The level of education had no obvious effect on the degree of knowledge about cervical cancer; however, with an improvement in education, women's awareness of HPV vaccine improved significantly (p < 0.05). Women who have received cervical cancer screening had significantly greater knowledge about cervical cancer and HPV than those with no screening (p < 0.05). Women in northeastern China have little knowledge of cervical cancer, HPV, and HPV vaccine, lack disease knowledge, and hold a skeptical attitude about HPV vaccination. Medical institutions are the main channel providing information to these women.
Pubmed ID: 31338812
Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.
Sustainability plan EpiData Software has since 2000 grown from securing the principles of Epi Info V6 to an independent and documentation based system with several translations and numerous downloads. To secure continued viability organisations and governments work is being done to secure for the future, see also the license principles - the ambition is to convert the programs to open-source within few years. Contributions are used for costs of development after version 1.5 (e.g. refining of programming, enhancing speed, maintenance of website, to pay for absence from paid work to do EpiData or other developmental and promotional efforts for EpiData). About the EpiData Association EpiData Software is from EpiData Entry version 2.0 and above released by the non-profit organisation The EpiData Association Odense, Denmark (In Danish: EpiData foreningen). The association receives NO baseline budget from anyone. The association has no employees Postal adress is: The EpiData Association, att. Jens Lauritsen, Enghavevej 34, DK5230 Odense M, Denmark, Europe The body of users of EpiData form the most important part of the basis of the EpiData Association. Those who choose to register as users will be asked when desicions are to made regarding additions to the program. Needs for documentation etc. Registration is done by adding your e-mail to the Information list. Supporting members or institutions adds to the foundation and development of EpiData by securing funding to pay for the associated costs. List of donors. The board of the association is made up of the core persons developing EpiData, currently Jens M.Lauritsen and Michael Bruus in collaboration with experienced users and the Friends Of EpiData group (FoED), comprising a group of international persons wishing to support the development of EpiData Sponsor. Without support from a number of NGO''s, Universities, Regional Health Authorities and other funding bodies EpiData development would have stopped
View all literature mentions