Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Strengths and limitations of morphological and behavioral analyses in detecting dopaminergic deficiency in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Latasha L Smith | Ian T Ryde | Jessica H Hartman | Riccardo F Romersi | Zachary Markovich | Joel N Meyer
Neurotoxicology | 2019

In order to develop a better understanding of the role environmental toxicants may play in the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases, it has become increasingly important to optimize sensitive methods for quickly screening toxicants to determine their ability to disrupt neuronal function. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can help with this effort. This species has an integrated nervous system producing behavioral function, provides easy access for molecular studies, has a rapid lifespan, and is an inexpensive model. This study focuses on methods of measuring neurodegeneration involving the dopaminergic system and the identification of compounds with actions that disrupt dopamine function in the model organism C. elegans. Several dopamine-mediated locomotory behaviors, Area Exploration, Body Bends, and Reversals, as well as Swimming-Induced Paralysis and Learned 2-Nonanone Avoidance, were compared to determine the best behavioral method for screening purposes. These behavioral endpoints were also compared to morphological scoring of neurodegeneration in the dopamine neurons. We found that in adult worms, Area Exploration is more advantageous than the other behavioral methods for identifying DA-deficient locomotion and is comparable to neuromorphological scoring outputs. For larval stage worms, locomotion was an unreliable endpoint, and neuronal scoring appeared to be the best method. We compared the wild-type N2 strain to the commonly used dat-1p::GFP reporter strains BY200 and BZ555, and we further characterized the dopamine-deficient strains, cat-2 e1112 and cat-2 n4547. In contrast to published results, we found that the cat-2 strains slowed on food almost as much as N2s. Both showed decreased levels of cat-2 mRNA and DA content, rather than none, with cat-2 e1112 having the greatest reduction in DA content in comparison to N2. Finally, we compared and contrasted strengths, limitations, cost, and equipment needs for all primary methods for analysis of the dopamine system in C. elegans.

Pubmed ID: 31323240

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

  • Agency: NIEHS NIH HHS, United States
    Id: F32 ES027306
  • Agency: NIEHS NIH HHS, United States
    Id: P42 ES010356
  • Agency: NIEHS NIH HHS, United States
    Id: R01 ES017540
  • Agency: NIGMS NIH HHS, United States
    Id: T32 GM007105

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


MT14984 (tool)

RRID:WB-STRAIN:WBStrain00027500

Caenorhabditis elegans with name tph-1(n4622) II. from WB.

View all literature mentions

MT15620 (tool)

RRID:WB-STRAIN:WBStrain00027527

Caenorhabditis elegans with name cat-2(n4547) II. from WB.

View all literature mentions

PR1162 (tool)

RRID:WB-STRAIN:WBStrain00030803

Caenorhabditis elegans with name cha-1(p503) IV. from WB.

View all literature mentions