Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

A Pilot Study on Resident and Pediatrician Knowledge and Confidence in the Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Jessica Mofidi | Natalya Sarkisova | Lindsay M Andras | Rachel Y Goldstein | Tracy L Zaslow | Bianca R Edison | David L Skaggs | Melissa A Bent
Global pediatric health | 2019

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to identify deficiencies in pediatric residents' and pediatricians' knowledge and confidence in diagnosing slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Methods. Pediatricians and residents at our institution answered an anonymous 12-question survey on knowledge and confidence in SCFE diagnosis. Results. Twenty pediatricians and 30 pediatric residents participated in the survey. Of 30 residents, 22 (77%) reported low confidence ordering radiographs evaluating for SCFE in patients with hip pain. Four of 20 pediatricians (20%) reported low confidence ordering radiographs for patients with hip pain. Forty percent (8/20) of pediatricians did not feel comfortable diagnosing a SCFE based on radiographs, which was significantly different from 80% (24/30) of residents who did not feel comfortable diagnosing a SCFE based on radiographs (P = .004). There was a significant difference between residents and pediatricians in comfort ordering and diagnosing radiographs (P < .01). There was no significance between pediatrician and resident scores for knowledge-based questions (P = .50). Discussion. Despite scoring well on knowledge-based questions, more than half of pediatricians and pediatric residents felt uncomfortable ordering radiographs to evaluate for SCFE in patients with hip or knee pain. This may be one factor contributing to the continued delay in SCFE diagnosis.

Pubmed ID: 31309132

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Additional research tools detected in this publication

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


REDCap (tool)

RRID:SCR_003445

Web application that allows users to build and manage online surveys and databases. Using REDCap's stream-lined process for rapidly developing projects, you may create and design projects using 1) the online method from your web browser using the Online Designer; and/or 2) the offline method by constructing a "data dictionary" template file in Microsoft Excel, which can be later uploaded into REDCap. Both surveys and databases (or a mixture of the two) can be built using these methods. REDCap provides audit trails for tracking data manipulation and user activity, as well as automated export procedures for seamless data downloads to Excel, PDF, and common statistical packages (SPSS, SAS, Stata, R). Also included are a built-in project calendar, a scheduling module, ad hoc reporting tools, and advanced features, such as branching logic, file uploading, and calculated fields. REDCap has a quick and easy software installation process, so that you can get REDCap running and fully functional in a matter of minutes. Several language translations have already been compiled for REDCap (e.g. Chinese, French, German, Portuguese), and it is anticipated that other languages will be available in full versions of REDCap soon. The REDCap Shared Library is a repository for REDCap data collection instruments and forms that can be downloaded and used by researchers at REDCap partner institutions.

View all literature mentions