Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Motives relate to cooperation in social dilemmas but have an inconsistent association with leadership evaluation.

Christian Wolff | Nina Keith
Scientific reports | 2019

A common assumption is that good leaders are driven by a power motive that motivates them to influence others. However, leaders need to restrain themselves in social dilemmas where cooperation maximizes collective outcomes. We theorize that in social dilemmas, a desire for positive relationships (affiliation motive) is more beneficial than a power motive because it draws attention away from short-term self-interest towards understanding others. In a game of Settlers of Catan in the laboratory, we find that a functional variant of the affiliation motive relates to verbal encouragement of cooperation, to fewer occurrences of oil spills, to higher ratings of transformational leadership and, in a field survey, to fewer selfish business decisions. Furthermore, a dysfunctional variant of the power motive relates to two of three indicators of selfishness. Group members perceive selfish individuals as assuming leadership roles which indirectly relates to slightly higher ratings of transformational leadership. This pattern of evaluation may privilege men who, on average, show more selfish behaviour which can be partially attributed to their motives. Mere awareness of gender-based discrimination does not enable raters to circumvent this pattern of evaluation. This work suggests a need for interventions that increase appreciation of cooperative leaders.

Pubmed ID: 31300675

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Additional research tools detected in this publication

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


American Psychological Association (tool)

RRID:SCR_004083

Based in Washington, D.C., the American Psychological Association (APA) is a scientific and professional organization that represents psychology in the United States. With more than 154,000 members, APA is the largest association of psychologists worldwide. The mission of the APA is to advance the creation, communication and application of psychological knowledge to benefit society and improve people''s lives. The American Psychological Association aspires to excel as a valuable, effective and influential organization advancing psychology as a science, serving as: * A uniting force for the discipline * The major catalyst for the stimulation, growth and dissemination of psychological science and practice * The primary resource for all psychologists * The premier innovator in the education, development, and training of psychological scientists, practitioners and educators * The leading advocate for psychological knowledge and practice informing policy makers and the public to improve public policy and daily living * A principal leader and global partner promoting psychological knowledge and methods to facilitate the resolution of personal, societal and global challenges in diverse, multicultural and international contexts * An effective champion of the application of psychology to promote human rights, health, well being and dignity APA and its affiliate organizations provide a diverse range of scholarships, grants, and awards with the aim of advancing research in psychology. Using our specialized search tool, you can find funding by type, sponsor, topic area, recipient type, and deadline date.

View all literature mentions