Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.
Biological target (commonly genes or proteins) identification is still largely a manual process, where experts manually try to collect and combine information from hundreds of data sources, ranging from scientific publications to omics databases. Targeting the wrong gene or protein will lead to failure of the drug development process, as well as incur delays and costs. To improve this process, different software platforms are being developed. These platforms rely strongly on efficacy estimates based on target-disease association scores created by computational methods for drug target prioritization. Here novel computational methods are presented to more accurately evaluate the efficacy and safety of potential drug targets. The proposed efficacy scores utilize existing gene expression data and tissue/disease specific networks to improve the inference of target-disease associations. Conversely, safety scores enable the identification of genes that are essential, potentially susceptible to adverse effects or carcinogenic. Benchmark results demonstrate that our transcriptome-based methods for drug target prioritization can increase the true positive rate of target-disease associations. Additionally, the proposed safety evaluation system enables accurate predictions of targets of withdrawn drugs and targets of drug trials prematurely discontinued.
Pubmed ID: 31285471
Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.
Bioinformatics and cheminformatics database that combines detailed drug (i.e. chemical, pharmacological and pharmaceutical) data with comprehensive drug target (i.e. sequence, structure, and pathway) information.
View all literature mentionsA controlled vocabulary thesaurus that consists of sets of terms naming descriptors in a hierarchical structure that permits searching at various levels of specificity. MeSH, in machine-readable form, is provided at no charge via electronic means. MeSH descriptors are arranged in both an alphabetic and a hierarchical structure. At the most general level of the hierarchical structure are very broad headings such as Anatomy or Mental Disorders. More specific headings are found at more narrow levels of the twelve-level hierarchy, such as Ankle and Conduct Disorder. There are 27,149 descriptors in 2014 MeSH. There are also over 218,000 entry terms that assist in finding the most appropriate MeSH Heading, for example, Vitamin C is an entry term to Ascorbic Acid. In addition to these headings, there are more than 219,000 headings called Supplementary Concept Records (formerly Supplementary Chemical Records) within a separate thesaurus. The MeSH thesaurus is used by NLM for indexing articles from 5,400 of the world''''s leading biomedical journals for the MEDLINE/PubMED database. It is also used for the NLM-produced database that includes cataloging of books, documents, and audiovisuals acquired by the Library. Each bibliographic reference is associated with a set of MeSH terms that describe the content of the item. Similarly, search queries use MeSH vocabulary to find items on a desired topic.
View all literature mentions