Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

An Image Analysis Solution For Quantification and Determination of Immunohistochemistry Staining Reproducibility.

Elizabeth A Chlipala | Christine M Bendzinski | Charlie Dorner | Raili Sartan | Karen Copeland | Roger Pearce | Faye Doherty | Brad Bolon
Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM | 2020

With immunohistochemical (IHC) staining increasingly being used to guide clinical decisions, variability in staining quality and reproducibility are becoming essential factors in generating diagnoses using IHC tissue preparations. The current study tested a method to track and quantify the interrun, intrarun, and intersite variability of IHC staining intensity. Our hypothesis was that staining precision between laboratory sites, staining runs, and individual slides may be verified quantitatively, efficiently and effectively utilizing algorithm-based, automated image analysis. To investigate this premise, we tested the consistency of IHC staining in 40 routinely processed (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) human tissues using 10 common antibiomarker antibodies on 2 Dako Omnis instruments at 2 locations (Carpinteria, CA: 30 m above sea level and Longmont, CO: 1500 m above sea level) programmed with identical, default settings and sample pretreatments. Digital images of IHC-labeled sections produced by a whole slide scanner were analyzed by a simple commercially available algorithm and compared with a board-certified veterinary pathologist's semiquantitative scoring of staining intensity. The image analysis output correlated well with pathology scores but had increased sensitivity for discriminating subtle variations and providing reproducible digital quantification across sites as well as within and among staining runs at the same site. Taken together, our data indicate that digital image analysis offers an objective and quantifiable means of verifying IHC staining parameters as a part of laboratory quality assurance systems.

Pubmed ID: 31082827

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Additional research tools detected in this publication

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


Dako (tool)

RRID:SCR_013530

An Antibody supplier; Dako was purchased by Agilent in 2012 and several years later the websites began to reflect the Dako products as part of the Agilent catalog.

View all literature mentions

ImageScope (tool)

RRID:SCR_014311

Slide image modification software that allows the user to adjust the magnification, compare slides, pan and zoom, annotate specific areas, and perform image analysis of digital slides. Users can create macros and algorithms to automate analysis and create plots, respectively.

View all literature mentions