Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association.

Grazia Ietto-Gillies
Frontiers in computational neuroscience | 2012

The paper starts with a brief discussion of the traditional peer review (TPR) system of research evaluation, its role, and the criticisms levelled at it. An analysis of specific problems in economics leads to a full discussion of the Open Peer Review (OPR) system developed by the World Economics Association (WEA) and the principles behind it. The system is open in the following two respects: (a) disclosure of names of authors and reviewers; and (b) inclusivity of potential reviewers in terms of paradigmatic approaches, country, and community. The paper then discusses the applicability of the same system to other disciplines. In doing so, it stressed the aims of various evaluation systems and the possible pitfalls of rating systems. It also speculates on the future of journal publication.

Pubmed ID: 22891057

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Additional research tools detected in this publication

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


F1000: Faculty of 1000 Post-Publication Peer Review (tool)

RRID:SCR_006537

Service that identifies and evaluates the most important articles in biology and medical research publications. The selection process comprises a peer-nominated global ''Faculty'' of the world''s leading scientists and clinicians who rate the best of the articles they read and explain their importance. Faculty Members and their evaluations are organized into over 40 Faculties (subjects), which are further subdivided into over 300 Sections. On average, 1500 new evaluations are published each month; this corresponds to approximately the top 2% of all published articles in the biological and medical sciences. F1000 is a subscription service paid for by academic and corporate institutions. Users at subscribing institutions automatically receive full access to the F1000 service when using internet facilities provided by their institution.

View all literature mentions