Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.
The identification of robust lists of molecular biomarkers related to a disease is a fundamental step for early diagnosis and treatment. However, methodologies for biomarker discovery using microarray data often provide results with limited overlap. It has been suggested that one reason for these inconsistencies may be that in complex diseases, such as cancer, multiple genes belonging to one or more physiological pathways are associated with the outcomes. Thus, a possible approach to improve list stability is to integrate biological information from genomic databases in the learning process; however, a comprehensive assessment based on different types of biological information is still lacking in the literature. In this work we have compared the effect of using different biological information in the learning process like functional annotations, protein-protein interactions and expression correlation among genes.
Pubmed ID: 22536969
Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.
Curated data set of a study that investigated the expression profiles of 347 primary invasive breast tumors on Affymetrix microarrays. Three separate breast cancer cohorts were analyzed: 1) Uppsala (n=249), 2) Stockholm (n=58), 3) Singapore (n=40). The Uppsala and Singapore data can be accessed in GSE4922. The Stockholm cohort data can be accessed at GEO Series GSE1456.
View all literature mentionsCurated series of expression data for 159 tumors from which RNA could be collected in sufficient amounts and quality for analysis from breast cancer patients. Tissue material was collected from all breast cancer patients receiving surgery at Karolinska Hospital from 1994-1996.
View all literature mentions