Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity.

Yiwen Chen | Nicolas Negre | Qunhua Li | Joanna O Mieczkowska | Matthew Slattery | Tao Liu | Yong Zhang | Tae-Kyung Kim | Housheng Hansen He | Jennifer Zieba | Yijun Ruan | Peter J Bickel | Richard M Myers | Barbara J Wold | Kevin P White | Jason D Lieb | X Shirley Liu
Nature methods | 2012

We evaluated how variations in sequencing depth and other parameters influence interpretation of chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments. Using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells, we generated ChIP-seq data sets for a site-specific transcription factor (Suppressor of Hairy-wing) and a histone modification (H3K36me3). We detected a chromatin-state bias: open chromatin regions yielded higher coverage, which led to false positives if not corrected. This bias had a greater effect on detection specificity than any base-composition bias. Paired-end sequencing revealed that single-end data underestimated ChIP-library complexity at high coverage. Removal of reads originating at the same base reduced false-positives but had little effect on detection sensitivity. Even at mappable-genome coverage depth of ∼1 read per base pair, ∼1% of the narrow peaks detected on a tiling array were missed by ChIP-seq. Evaluation of widely used ChIP-seq analysis tools suggests that adjustments or algorithm improvements are required to handle data sets with deep coverage.

Pubmed ID: 22522655

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Additional research tools detected in this publication

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

  • Agency: NHGRI NIH HHS, United States
    Id: U01 HG004264
  • Agency: NHGRI NIH HHS, United States
    Id: U01HG004264
  • Agency: NHGRI NIH HHS, United States
    Id: HG4069
  • Agency: NHGRI NIH HHS, United States
    Id: R01 HG004069
  • Agency: NHGRI NIH HHS, United States
    Id: 3U01HG004270-03S1
  • Agency: NHGRI NIH HHS, United States
    Id: U01 HG004270

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


RepeatMasker (tool)

RRID:SCR_012954

Software tool that screens DNA sequences for interspersed repeats and low complexity DNA sequences. The output of the program is a detailed annotation of the repeats that are present in the query sequence as well as a modified version of the query sequence in which all the annotated repeats have been masked (default: replaced by Ns). Currently over 56% of human genomic sequence is identified and masked by the program. Sequence comparisons in RepeatMasker are performed by one of several popular search engines including nhmmer, cross_match, ABBlast/WUBlast, RMBlast and Decypher. RepeatMasker makes use of curated libraries of repeats and currently supports Dfam ( profile HMM library ) and RepBase ( consensus sequence library ).

View all literature mentions

F-Seq (tool)

RRID:SCR_010880

A software package that generates a continuous tag sequence density estimation allowing identification of biologically meaningful sites whose output can be displayed directly in the UCSC Genome Browser.

View all literature mentions