Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

How many spots with missing values can be tolerated in quantitative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis when applying univariate statistics?

Maria Zellner | Alexandra Graf | Sonja Zehetmayer | Wolfgang Winkler | An Staes | Kris Gevaert | Joël Vandekerckhove | Martina Marchetti-Deschmann | Ingrid Miller | Peter Bauer | Günter Allmaier | Rudolf Oehler
Journal of proteomics | 2012

Quantitative proteomic comparisons require a sufficient number of samples to reach an acceptable level of significance. But 2D gel electrophoresis commonly results in incomplete data sets due to spots with missing values reducing thereby the number of parallel measurements for individual proteins. Here we investigated how many missing values per spot can be tolerated. The number of spots in common between all gels was found to decrease with the number of parallel gels in a non-linear fashion. Increasing numbers of missing values were associated with a moderate increase in the quantitative variation of spot volumes. Based on the missing value pattern in 20 gels we performed an analysis of the multiple testing power for the hypothetical scenario of a comparative 2DE study with six or twelve parallel gels. The calculation considered the statistical power of the individual spot as well as the number of spots included in the analysis. The power increased with inclusion of spots with higher number of missing values and showed an optimum at a specific minimum number of spot replicates. The results suggest that proteins with missing values can be included in a univariate analysis as long as a sufficient number of parallel gels are made.

Pubmed ID: 22227400

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Additional research tools detected in this publication

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


CRAN (tool)

RRID:SCR_003005

Network of ftp and web servers around world that store identical, up to date, versions of code and documentation for R. Package archive network for R programming language.

View all literature mentions

Mascot (tool)

RRID:SCR_014322

A software package and server used to identify and characterize proteins from primary sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Mascot integrates peptide mass fingerprinting, sequence querying, and MS/MS ion searching in order to search for proteins in databases like SwissProt, NCBInr, EMBL EST divisions, contaminants, and cRAP. If a license is purchased, users may: search data sets that exceed the 1200 spectrum limit of the free version; set up automated, high throughput work; add and edit proteins and quantification methods; and search a preferred collection of sequence databases. The software package works with instruments from AB Sciex, Agilent, Bruker, Jeol, Shimadzu, Thermo Scientific, and Waters.

View all literature mentions

ClustalW (tool)

RRID:SCR_017277

Web sevice of ClustalW provided by DNA data bank of Japan.

View all literature mentions