Searching across hundreds of databases

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Neuroprotective effect of acute ethanol intoxication in TBI is associated to the hierarchical modulation of early transcriptional responses.

A Chandrasekar | B Aksan | FO Heuvel | P Förstner | D Sinske | R Rehman | A Palmer | A Ludolph | M Huber-Lang | T Böckers | D Mauceri | B Knöll | F Roselli
Experimental neurology | 2018 Apr

Ethanol intoxication is a risk factor for traumatic brain injury (TBI) but clinical evidence suggests that it may actually improve the prognosis of intoxicated TBI patients. We have employed a closed, weight-drop TBI model of different severity (2cm or 3cm falling height), preceded (-30min) or followed (+20min) by ethanol administration (5g/Kg). This protocol allows us to study the interaction of binge ethanol intoxication in TBI, monitoring behavioral changes, histological responses and the transcriptional regulation of a series of activity-regulated genes (immediate early genes, IEGs). We demonstrate that ethanol pretreatment before moderate TBI (2cm) significantly reduces neurological impairment and accelerates recovery. In addition, better preservation of neuronal numbers and cFos+cells was observed 7days after TBI. At transcriptional level, ethanol reduced the upregulation of a subset of IEGs encoding for transcription factors such as Atf3, c-Fos, FosB, Egr1, Egr3 and Npas4 but did not affect the upregulation of others (e.g. Gadd45b and Gadd45c). While a subset of IEGs encoding for effector proteins (such as Bdnf, InhbA and Dusp5) were downregulated by ethanol, others (such as Il-6) were unaffected. Notably, the majority of genes were sensitive to ethanol only when administered before TBI and not afterwards (the exceptions being c-Fos, Egr1 and Dusp5). Furthermore, while severe TBI (3cm) induced a qualitatively similar (but quantitatively larger) transcriptional response to moderate TBI, it was no longer sensitive to ethanol pretreatment. Thus, we have shown that a subset of the TBI-induced transcriptional responses were sensitive to ethanol intoxication at the instance of trauma (ultimately resulting in beneficial outcomes) and that the effect of ethanol was restricted to a certain time window (pre TBI treatment) and to TBI severity (moderate). This information could be critical for the translational value of ethanol in TBI and for the design of clinical studies aimed at disentangling the role of ethanol intoxication in TBI.

Pubmed ID: 29306704

TBI Model

  • Weight-drop model
  • Closed Weight-drop model
  • Animal Information

  • Species: mouse
  • Strain: C57BL/6-SJL
  • Age (weeks): No age reported
  • Weight (grams): No weight reported
  • Assessments

    Beam walk test, Blood ethanol level, Confocal imaging, Neurological Severity Score (NSS), open field test, qRT-PCR, Western blot, histology

    TBI model parameters

  • Impact Depth (mm): No information available
  • Impact Duration (ms): No information available
  • Impact Velocity (m/s): No information available
  • Impactor Tip: No information available
  • Device Name

    No information available

    Associated Datasets

    No information available

    Associated Protocols

    No information available