Searching across hundreds of databases

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Convolutional Neural Networks Enable Robust Automatic Segmentation of the Rat Hippocampus in MRI After Traumatic Brain Injury.

R De Feo | E Hämäläinen | E Manninen | R Immonen | JM Valverde | XE Ndode-Ekane | O Gröhn | A Pitkänen | J Tohka
Frontiers in neurology | 2022

Registration-based methods are commonly used in the automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) brain images. However, these methods are not robust to the presence of gross pathologies that can alter the brain anatomy and affect the alignment of the atlas image with the target image. In this work, we develop a robust algorithm, MU-Net-R, for automatic segmentation of the normal and injured rat hippocampus based on an ensemble of U-net-like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). MU-Net-R was trained on manually segmented MR images of sham-operated rats and rats with traumatic brain injury (TBI) by lateral fluid percussion. The performance of MU-Net-R was quantitatively compared with methods based on single and multi-atlas registration using MR images from two large preclinical cohorts. Automatic segmentations using MU-Net-R and multi-atlas registration were of excellent quality, achieving cross-validated Dice scores above 0.90 despite the presence of brain lesions, atrophy, and ventricular enlargement. In contrast, the performance of single-atlas segmentation was unsatisfactory (cross-validated Dice scores below 0.85). Interestingly, the registration-based methods were better at segmenting the contralateral than the ipsilateral hippocampus, whereas MU-Net-R segmented the contralateral and ipsilateral hippocampus equally well. We assessed the progression of hippocampal damage after TBI by using our automatic segmentation tool. Our data show that the presence of TBI, time after TBI, and whether the hippocampus was ipsilateral or contralateral to the injury were the parameters that explained hippocampal volume.

Pubmed ID: 35250823

TBI Model

  • Fluid percussion injury model
  • Lateral fluid percussion injury model
  • Animal Information

  • Species: rat
  • Strain: Sprague-Dawley
  • Age (weeks): No age reported
  • Weight (grams): No weight reported
  • Assessments

    CNN-based segmentation maps, Loss Function, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hippocampus segmentation task, skull-stripping task

    TBI model parameters

  • Impact Depth (mm): No information available
  • Impact Duration (ms): No information available
  • Impact Velocity (m/s): No information available
  • Impactor Tip: No information available
  • Device Name

    No information available

    Associated Datasets

    No information available

    Associated Protocols

    No information available