Searching across hundreds of databases

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Characterization of controlled cortical impact devices by high-speed image analysis.

Y Kim | AH Fu | LB Tucker | J Liu | JT McCabe
Journal of neuroscience research | 2018 Apr

As a consequence of their commercial availability, ease of use, and reproducibility, controlled cortical impact (CCI) devices have attained significant prevalence in preclinical traumatic brain injury research. With a CCI, the severity of injury is controlled by varying the impact depth, velocity, and duration, but the actual performance of the device is not well appreciated, partly because of the velocity and short travel distance to impact. This study used a high-speed video digital camera to investigate the performance of five electromagnetically driven CCI devices of the same model. Videography indicated that the impactor tip made a series of distinctive vertical advances and retractions before it attained the desired preset depth; this was also observed in male mouse CCI tests. The impactor tip was also observed to move in the horizontal direction by .8-1.6 mm. On the first advance, the tip extended a distance that was shorter than the preset depth and the velocity of impactor tip was slightly faster than the preset values for three of the five machines. One of the devices was evaluated on four separate occasions over a 14-month period and was found to operate consistently over time. Overall, differences in impact depth and velocity between the devices were modest, suggesting that comparisons of experimental results from different laboratories will generally be informative, particularly if reports provide relevant descriptions of neuropathology. However, the repetitive extension and retraction and horizontal movement of the tip suggests caution in modeling CCI as a single injurious event.

Pubmed ID: 28675644

Animal Information

  • Species: mouse
  • Strain: C57BL/6J
  • Age (weeks): 10 - 10
  • Weight (grams): No weight reported
  • Assessments

    Impactor tip motion

    TBI model parameters

  • Impact Depth (mm): 1
  • Impact Duration (ms): 100
  • Impact Velocity (m/s): 3.5
  • Impactor Tip: tip diameter - 3 mm, tip length - 2.5 cm
  • Device Name

    Impact Oneā„¢ Stereotaxic Impactor

    Associated Datasets

    No information available

    Associated Protocols

    No information available