Searching across hundreds of databases

Our searching services are busy right now. Your search will reload in five seconds.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

This service exclusively searches for literature that cites resources. Please be aware that the total number of searchable documents is limited to those containing RRIDs and does not include all open-access literature.

Search

Type in a keyword to search

On page 1 showing 1 ~ 3 papers out of 3 papers

Computed Tomography and Spirometry Can Predict Unresectability in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

  • Alice Bellini‎ et al.
  • Journal of clinical medicine‎
  • 2021‎

Preoperative identification of unresectable pleural mesothelioma could spare unnecessary surgical intervention and accelerate the initiation of medical treatments. The aim of this study is to determine predictors of unresectability, testing our impression that the contraction of the ipsilateral hemithorax is often associated with exploratory thoracotomy. Between 1994 and 2020, 291 patients undergoing intended macroscopic complete resection for mesothelioma after chemotherapy were retrospectively investigated. Eligible patients (n = 58) presented a preoperative 3 mm slice-thickness chest computed tomography without pleural effusion or hydropneumothorax. Lung volumes (segmented using a semi-automated method), modified-Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) measurements, and spirometries were collected after chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the predictors of unresectability. An unresectable disease was found at the time of operation in 25.9% cases. By multivariable analysis, the total lung capacity (p = 0.03) and the disease burden (p = 0.02) were found to be predictors of unresectability; cut-off values were <77.5% and >120.5 mm, respectively. Lung volumes were not confirmed to be associated with unresectability at multivariable analysis, probably due to the correlation with the disease burden (p < 0.001; r = -0.4). Our study suggests that disease burden and total lung capacity could predict MPM unresectability, helping surgeons in recommending surgery or not in a multimodality setting.


Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: A Review of the Most Updated Literature and a Presentation of Three Cases.

  • Alessandro Bonis‎ et al.
  • Journal of clinical medicine‎
  • 2023‎

In a Surgical Thoracic Center, two females and a man were unexpectedly diagnosed with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung (HAL) in a single year. HAL is a rare lung cancer with pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma with no evidence of liver tumor or other primitive sites of neoplasms. As of today, a comprehensive treatment is still not written. We reviewed the most updated literature on HAL, aiming to highlight the proposed treatments available, and comparing them in terms of survival. General hallmarks of HAL are confirmed: it typically affects middle-aged, heavy-smoker males with a median of 5 cm bulky right upper lobe mass. Overall survival remains poor (13 months), with a longer but non-significant survival in females. Treatments are still unsatisfactory today: surgery guarantees a small benefit compared to non-operated HALs, and only N0 patients demonstrated improved survival (p = 0.04) compared to N1, N2, and N3. Even though the histology is fearsome, these are probably the patients who will benefit from upfront surgery. Chemotherapy seemed to behave as surgery, and there is no statistical difference between chemotherapy only, surgery, or adjuvant treatments, even though adjuvant treatments tend to be more successful. New chemotherapies have been reported with notable results in recent years, such as Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. In this complicated picture, new cases are needed to further build shared evidence in terms of diagnosis, treatments, and survival opportunities.


Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts.

  • Elena Stocco‎ et al.
  • Cells‎
  • 2023‎

Tracheal reconstruction represents a challenge when primary anastomosis is not feasible. Within this scenario, the study aim was to develop a new pig-derived decellularized trachea (DecellT) to be compared with the cryopreserved counterpart (CryoT) for a close predictive analysis. Tracheal segments underwent decellularization by a physical + enzymatic + chemical method (12 cycles); in parallel, cryopreserved samples were also prepared. Once decellularized (histology/DNA quantification), the two groups were characterized for Alpha-Gal epitopes/structural proteins (immunohistochemistry/histology/biochemical assays/second harmonic generation microscopy)/ultrastructure (Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM))/mechanical behaviour. Cytotoxicity absence was assessed in vitro (extract-test assay/direct seeding, HM1SV40 cell line) while biocompatibility was verified in BALB/c mice, followed by histological/immunohistochemical analyses and SEM (14 days). Decellularization effectively removed Alpha-Gal epitopes; cartilage histoarchitecture was retained in both groups, showing chondrocytes only in the CryoT. Cryopreservation maintained few respiratory epithelium sparse cilia, not detectable in DecellT. Focusing on ECM, preserved structural/ultrastructural organization and collagen content were observed in the cartilage of both; conversely, the GAGs were significantly reduced in DecellT, as confirmed by mechanical study results. No cytotoxicity was highlighted by CryoT/DecellT in vitro, as they were also corroborated by a biocompatibility assay. Despite some limitations (cells presence/GAGs reduction), CryoT/DecellT are both appealing options, which warrant further investigation in comparative in vivo studies.


  1. SciCrunch.org Resources

    Welcome to the FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org Resources search. From here you can search through a compilation of resources used by FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org and see how data is organized within our community.

  2. Navigation

    You are currently on the Community Resources tab looking through categories and sources that FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org has compiled. You can navigate through those categories from here or change to a different tab to execute your search through. Each tab gives a different perspective on data.

  3. Logging in and Registering

    If you have an account on FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org then you can log in from here to get additional features in FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org such as Collections, Saved Searches, and managing Resources.

  4. Searching

    Here is the search term that is being executed, you can type in anything you want to search for. Some tips to help searching:

    1. Use quotes around phrases you want to match exactly
    2. You can manually AND and OR terms to change how we search between words
    3. You can add "-" to terms to make sure no results return with that term in them (ex. Cerebellum -CA1)
    4. You can add "+" to terms to require they be in the data
    5. Using autocomplete specifies which branch of our semantics you with to search and can help refine your search
  5. Save Your Search

    You can save any searches you perform for quick access to later from here.

  6. Query Expansion

    We recognized your search term and included synonyms and inferred terms along side your term to help get the data you are looking for.

  7. Collections

    If you are logged into FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org you can add data records to your collections to create custom spreadsheets across multiple sources of data.

  8. Facets

    Here are the facets that you can filter your papers by.

  9. Options

    From here we'll present any options for the literature, such as exporting your current results.

  10. Further Questions

    If you have any further questions please check out our FAQs Page to ask questions and see our tutorials. Click this button to view this tutorial again.

Publications Per Year

X

Year:

Count: