Searching across hundreds of databases

Our searching services are busy right now. Your search will reload in five seconds.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

This service exclusively searches for literature that cites resources. Please be aware that the total number of searchable documents is limited to those containing RRIDs and does not include all open-access literature.

Search

Type in a keyword to search

On page 1 showing 1 ~ 2 papers out of 2 papers

Systematic investigation of hierarchical phosphorylation by protein kinase CK2.

  • Nicole St-Denis‎ et al.
  • Journal of proteomics‎
  • 2015‎

Although multiple phosphorylation sites are often clustered in substrates, the mechanism of phosphorylation within clusters has not been systematically investigated. Intriguingly, in addition to acidic residues, protein kinase CK2 can use phosphoserine residues as consensus determinants suggesting that CK2 may act in concert with other kinases. We used a peptide array approach to outline optimal consensus sequences for hierarchical phosphorylation by CK2, both in the context of processive, multisite phosphorylation, and in concert with a priming proline-directed kinase. Results suggest that hierarchical phosphorylation involving CK2 requires precise positioning of either multiple phosphodeterminant residues or specific combinations of canonical determinants and phosphodeterminants, and can be as enzymatically favorable as canonical CK2 phosphorylation. Over 1600 human proteins contain at least one CK2 hierarchical consensus motif, and ~20% of these motifs contain at least one reported in vivo phosphorylation site. These motifs occur non-randomly in the human proteome, with significant enrichment in proteins controlling specific cellular processes. Taken together, our results provide strong in vitro evidence that hierarchical phosphorylation may contribute to the regulation of crucial biological processes. In addition, the results suggest a mechanism by which CK2, a constitutively active kinase, can be a regulatory participant in cellular processes.


Functional proteomics strategy for validation of protein kinase inhibitors reveals new targets for a TBB-derived inhibitor of protein kinase CK2.

  • Laszlo Gyenis‎ et al.
  • Journal of proteomics‎
  • 2013‎

CK2 is a constitutively active protein kinase with key regulatory roles in many cellular signaling events which has been implicated in several human diseases. To investigate its roles in biological events and potential as a therapeutic target, several potent CK2 inhibitors have been developed including TBB and its derivatives that have been employed in many studies. Despite the utility of these compounds, a precise understanding of their mode of action within cells remains incomplete. In fact, cells are typically treated with inhibitor concentrations (>5 μM) that are orders of magnitude higher than their in vitro inhibitory constants (<0.05 μM). Accordingly, we hypothesized that CK2 inhibitors could have off-target effects that are not recognized when inhibitors are profiled using panels of recombinant protein kinases. To address this issue, we combined structural modeling with inhibitor-affinity purification and proteomics to test the specificity of derivatives of TBB using whole cell lysates of HeLa cells. While these studies confirmed that CK2 does bind to the immobilized inhibitor, several other abundant ATP/GTP-binding proteins were also identified and confirmed. These results suggest that highly abundant nucleotide binding proteins may limit the bioavailability of the free inhibitor and interactions with CK2 in the cellular environment. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: From protein structures to clinical applications.


  1. SciCrunch.org Resources

    Welcome to the FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org Resources search. From here you can search through a compilation of resources used by FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org and see how data is organized within our community.

  2. Navigation

    You are currently on the Community Resources tab looking through categories and sources that FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org has compiled. You can navigate through those categories from here or change to a different tab to execute your search through. Each tab gives a different perspective on data.

  3. Logging in and Registering

    If you have an account on FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org then you can log in from here to get additional features in FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org such as Collections, Saved Searches, and managing Resources.

  4. Searching

    Here is the search term that is being executed, you can type in anything you want to search for. Some tips to help searching:

    1. Use quotes around phrases you want to match exactly
    2. You can manually AND and OR terms to change how we search between words
    3. You can add "-" to terms to make sure no results return with that term in them (ex. Cerebellum -CA1)
    4. You can add "+" to terms to require they be in the data
    5. Using autocomplete specifies which branch of our semantics you with to search and can help refine your search
  5. Save Your Search

    You can save any searches you perform for quick access to later from here.

  6. Query Expansion

    We recognized your search term and included synonyms and inferred terms along side your term to help get the data you are looking for.

  7. Collections

    If you are logged into FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org you can add data records to your collections to create custom spreadsheets across multiple sources of data.

  8. Facets

    Here are the facets that you can filter your papers by.

  9. Options

    From here we'll present any options for the literature, such as exporting your current results.

  10. Further Questions

    If you have any further questions please check out our FAQs Page to ask questions and see our tutorials. Click this button to view this tutorial again.

Publications Per Year

X

Year:

Count: