Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, due to acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs, even patients on third-generation osimertinib have a poor prognosis. Resistance mechanisms are still not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that the increased expression of MUSASHI-2 (MSI2), an RNA-binding protein, is a novel mechanism for resistance to EGFR-TKIs. We found that after a long-term exposure to gefitinib, the first-generation EGFR-TKI lung cancer cells harboring the EGFR-TKI-sensitive mutations became resistant to both gefitinib and osimertinib. Although other mutations in EGFR were not found, expression levels of Nanog, a stemness core protein, and activities of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) were increased, suggesting that cancer stem-like properties were increased. Transcriptome analysis revealed that MSI2 was among the stemness-related genes highly upregulated in EGFR-TKI-resistant cells. Knockdown of MSI2 reduced cancer stem-like properties, including the expression levels of Nanog, a core stemness factor. We demonstrated that knockdown of MSI2 restored sensitivity to osimertinib or gefitinib in EGFR-TKI-resistant cells to levels similar to those of parental cells in vitro. An RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay revealed that antibodies against MSI2 were bound to Nanog mRNA, suggesting that MSI2 increases Nanog expression by binding to Nanog mRNA. Moreover, overexpression of MSI2 or Nanog conferred resistance to osimertinib or gefitinib in parental cells. Finally, MSI2 knockdown greatly increased the sensitivity to osimertinib in vivo. Collectively, our findings provide proof of principle that targeting the MSI2-Nanog axis in combination with EGFR-TKIs would effectively prevent the emergence of acquired resistance.

To identify prognostic factors in patients with grade 3 (high-grade) endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, we evaluated the spectrum of genomic alterations and examined whether previously reported molecular subtypes of endometrial carcinoma were adapted to clinical outcome prediction. Seventy-five Japanese patients with grade 3 endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, who underwent a potentially curative resection procedure between 1997 and 2018 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, were included. We classified the patients into four risk groups of the disease based on the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer. Genomic alterations in PTEN, ARID1A, TP53, and PIK3CA were detected in more than 30% of the patients. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients with genomic alterations in CTNNB1 were poorer than those of patients with wild-type CTNNB1 (p = 0.006 and p = 0.004, respectively). Compared with that of alterations prevalent in Caucasians, the frequency of genomic alterations in POLE and TP53 was higher in our study than in The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset (p = 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). The tendency for recurrence-free survival in the POLE exonuclease domain mutation group was better than that in the TP53 mutation and mismatch repair-deficient groups (p = 0.08 and p = 0.07, respectively), consistent with the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer risk classifier definition. The CTNNB1 mutation is a potential novel biomarker for the prognosis of patients with grade 3 endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, and prognosis classification using Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer may help screen Japanese patients with the disease.

Advances in cancer genome care over the past few years have included the development of gene panel testing for various biomarkers. This article summarizes issues and provides recommendations related to analytical performance evaluations for new oncology gene panels. The scope of these recommendations includes comprehensive genomic profiling assays related to gene panel testing that uses histological or serum specimens to detect gene mutations. As a research project of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development Research on Regulatory Science of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices, we convened the working group committee that consisted of more than 30 experts from academia, industry, and government. We have discussed the points that should be considered to allow maximal simplification of assessments using clinical specimens in evaluating accuracy and limit of detection in equivalence and analytical performance for 3 years. We provide recommendations specific to each type of gene mutation as well as to reference standards or specimens used for evaluations. In addition, in order to facilitate the discussion on the analytical performance of gene panel tests by multidisciplinary tumor boards of hospitals, the present recommendations also describe the items that companies are expected to provide information on in their packaging inserts and reports, and the items that are expected to be discussed by multidisciplinary tumor boards. Our working group document will be important for participants in multidisciplinary tumor boards, including medical oncologists and genome scientists, and developers of gene panels not only in Japan but also in other countries.

Identification of genetic alterations through next-generation sequencing (NGS) can guide treatment decision-making by providing information on diagnosis, therapy selection, and prognostic stratification in patients with hematological malignancies. Although the utility of NGS-based genomic profiling assays was investigated in hematological malignancies, no assays sufficiently cover driver mutations, including recently discovered ones, as well as fusions and/or pathogenic germline variants. To address these issues, here we have devised an integrated DNA/RNA profiling assay to detect various types of somatic alterations and germline variants at once. Particularly, our assay can successfully identify copy number alterations and structural variations, including immunoglobulin heavy chain translocations, IKZF1 intragenic deletions, and rare fusions. Using this assay, we conducted a prospective study to investigate the feasibility and clinical usefulness of comprehensive genomic profiling for 452 recurrently altered genes in hematological malignancies. In total, 176 patients (with 188 specimens) were analyzed, in which at least one alteration was detected in 171 (97%) patients, with a median number of total alterations of 7 (0-55). Among them, 145 (82%), 86 (49%), and 102 (58%) patients harbored at least one clinically relevant alteration for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, respectively. The proportion of patients with clinically relevant alterations was the highest in acute myeloid leukemia, whereas this assay was less informative in T/natural killer-cell lymphoma. These results suggest the clinical utility of NGS-based genomic profiling, particularly for their diagnosis and prognostic prediction, thereby highlighting the promise of precision medicine in hematological malignancies.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumor tissue (ie, clinical sequencing) can guide clinical management by providing information about actionable gene aberrations that have diagnostic and therapeutic significance. Here, we undertook a hospital-based prospective study (TOP-GEAR project, 2nd stage) to investigate the feasibility and utility of NGS-based analysis of 114 cancer-associated genes (the NCC Oncopanel test). We examined 230 cases (comprising more than 30 tumor types) of advanced solid tumors, all of which were matched with nontumor samples. Gene profiling data were obtained for 187 cases (81.3%), 111 (59.4%) of which harbored actionable gene aberrations according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Next Generation Sequencing in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (Edition 1.0) issued by 3 major Japanese cancer-related societies. Twenty-five (13.3%) cases have since received molecular-targeted therapy according to their gene aberrations. These results indicate the utility of tumor-profiling multiplex gene panel testing in a clinical setting in Japan. This study is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN 000011141).