In order to investigate the accessibility of the nucleoplasm for macromolecules with different physical properties, we microinjected FITC-conjugated dextrans of different sizes as well as anionic FITC-dextrans and FITC-poly-L-lysine into mammalian cell nuclei. Small dextrans displayed a homogeneous nuclear distribution. With increasing molecular mass (42 to 2500 kDa), FITC-dextrans were progressively excluded from chromatin regions, accumulating in and thereby outlining an apparently extended interchromatin space. Anionic FITC-dextrans (500 kDa) showed complete exclusion from labeled chromatin regions, while the positively charged FITC-poly-L-lysine was to some extent present within the chromatin regions. Moreover, the FITC-poly-L-lysine preferentially localized at the nuclear periphery. We also found a size-dependent exclusion of FITC-dextrans from nucleoli regions, while the FITC-poly-L-lysine accumulated in the nucleoli. Thus, the distinct and restricted nuclear accessibility for macromolecules is dependent on molecule size and electrical charge.

Specific chromosomal translocations are hallmarks of many human leukemias. The basis for these translocation events is poorly understood, but it has been assumed that spatial positioning of genes in the nucleus of hematopoietic cells is a contributing factor. Analysis of the nuclear 3D position of the gene MLL, frequently involved in chromosomal translocations and five of its translocation partners (AF4, AF6, AF9, ENL and ELL), and two control loci revealed a characteristic radial distribution pattern in all hematopoietic cells studied. Genes in areas of high local gene density were found positioned towards the nuclear center, whereas genes in regions of low gene density were detected closer to the nuclear periphery. The gene density within a 2 Mbp window was found to be a better predictor for the relative positioning of a genomic locus within the cell nucleus than the gene density of entire chromosomes. Analysis of the position of MLL, AF4, AF6 and AF9 in cell lines carrying chromosomal translocations involving these genes revealed that the position of the normal genes was different from that of the fusion genes, and this was again consistent with the changes in local gene density within a 2 Mbp window. Thus, alterations in gene density directly at translocation junctions could explain the change in the position of affected genes in leukemia cells.