Searching across hundreds of databases
Health Care Professionals (HCPs), including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and paramedics, are a high-risk group for influenza infection due to their continuous exposure to patients having a known or unknown history of influenza-like illnesses. Influenza vaccination is the most effective method of primary prevention. This study was conducted to assess knowledge, attitude, practice, and barriers associated with influenza vaccination among HCPs at tertiary care hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan. A multicenter analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among HCPs. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. All statistical analyses were conducted in R software. A total of 400 HCPs were enrolled, and among these, 67% had a high level of knowledge and 65.5% had a positive attitude towards influenza vaccination. About 51% of HCPs adopted good practices leading to influenza vaccination. Results identified major barriers for influenza vaccinations, including unfamiliarity with vaccine availability (RII = 0.760), insufficient staff for administering the vaccine (RII = 0.649), lack of proper storage (RII = 0.625), safety concerns (RII = 0.613), and cost of vaccine (RII = 0.602). More than half of the HCPs showed a high level of knowledge, a positive attitude, and good practice against influenza vaccination. Despite the positive Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) scores and published guidelines, a very low percentage of HCPs were vaccinated against influenza. Many hindering factors were associated with influenza vaccination.
Pubmed ID: 36679981 RIS Download
Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.
Sustainability plan EpiData Software has since 2000 grown from securing the principles of Epi Info V6 to an independent and documentation based system with several translations and numerous downloads. To secure continued viability organisations and governments work is being done to secure for the future, see also the license principles - the ambition is to convert the programs to open-source within few years. Contributions are used for costs of development after version 1.5 (e.g. refining of programming, enhancing speed, maintenance of website, to pay for absence from paid work to do EpiData or other developmental and promotional efforts for EpiData). About the EpiData Association EpiData Software is from EpiData Entry version 2.0 and above released by the non-profit organisation The EpiData Association Odense, Denmark (In Danish: EpiData foreningen). The association receives NO baseline budget from anyone. The association has no employees Postal adress is: The EpiData Association, att. Jens Lauritsen, Enghavevej 34, DK5230 Odense M, Denmark, Europe The body of users of EpiData form the most important part of the basis of the EpiData Association. Those who choose to register as users will be asked when desicions are to made regarding additions to the program. Needs for documentation etc. Registration is done by adding your e-mail to the Information list. Supporting members or institutions adds to the foundation and development of EpiData by securing funding to pay for the associated costs. List of donors. The board of the association is made up of the core persons developing EpiData, currently Jens M.Lauritsen and Michael Bruus in collaboration with experienced users and the Friends Of EpiData group (FoED), comprising a group of international persons wishing to support the development of EpiData Sponsor. Without support from a number of NGO''s, Universities, Regional Health Authorities and other funding bodies EpiData development would have stopped
View all literature mentionsSoftware application with data analysis tools and spreadsheet templates to track and visualize data. It is used to manage and process data.
View all literature mentionsThe SciCrunch Infrastructure was developed as a cooperative data platform to be used by diverse communities in making data more FAIR.
scicrunch.org
