Searching across hundreds of databases

Our searching services are busy right now. Your search will reload in five seconds.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

How does tripus extirpation affect auditory sensitivity in goldfish?

Hearing research | 2003

Otophysine fishes are characterized by Weberian ossicles connecting the swimbladder to the ear acoustically. In order to determine the degree to which these ossicles contribute to auditory sensitivity, the tripus was unilaterally or bilaterally extirpated in goldfish and hearing thresholds determined. The auditory evoked potential (AEP) recording technique was used to measure auditory sensitivity between 100 and 4000 Hz. Bilateral extirpation resulted in a hearing loss at all frequencies ranging from 7 dB at 100 Hz to 33 dB at 2 kHz; no AEPs were detectable at 4 kHz. In contrast to bilateral extirpation, unilateral tripus removal caused no sensitivity change. Pre-exposure to intense white noise caused different threshold shifts in unilaterally versus bilaterally extirpated goldfish. Thresholds increased at all frequencies in unilaterally extirpated goldfish but only at 100 and 200 Hz after bilateral extirpation. The comparison between the hearing generalist Neolamprologus brichardi (family Cichlidae) and the tripus-extirpated otophysine revealed that the latter is still more sensitive than the cichlid. Higher sensitivity in the goldfish after bilateral extirpation as compared to swimbladder elimination indicates that swimbladder oscillations might partly be transmitted to the inner ear independently of the ossicular chain. This suggests that the auditory system in otophysines improves with increasing frequency due to a more efficient connection between the swimbladder and inner ear ensured by the Weberian ossicles.

Pubmed ID: 12948607 RIS Download

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


BioSig: An Imaging Bioinformatics System for Phenotypic Analysis (tool)

RRID:SCR_008428

Software library for processing of electroencephalogram (EEG) and other biomedical signals like electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocorticogram (ECoG), electrocardiogram (ECG), electrooculogram (EOG), electromyogram (EMG), respiration, and so on. Biosig contains tools for quality control, artifact processing, time series analysis, feature extraction, classification and machine learning, and tools for statistical analysis. Many tools are able to handle data with missing values (statistics, time series analysis, machine learning). Another feature is that more then 40 different data formats are supported, and a number of converters for EEG,, ECG and polysomnography are provided. Biosig has been widely used for scientific research on EEG-based BraiN-Computer Interfaces (BCI), sleep research, and ECG and HRV analysis. It provides software interfaces several programming languages (C, C++, Matlab/Octave, Python), and it provides also an interactive viewing and scoring software for adding, and editing of annotations, markers and events.

View all literature mentions

BioSigRP (tool)

RRID:SCR_014590

Software used to automate the process of presenting stimulus signals and acquiring signal data. The software is designed to work with System 3 hardware and files generated by TDT's signal design software SigGenRP.

View all literature mentions