Genetic deletion of the adenosine A1 receptor (A1AR) increased renal injury following ischemia-reperfusion injury suggesting that receptor activation is protective in vivo. Here we tested this hypothesis by expressing the human-A(1)AR in A(1)AR knockout mice. Renal ischemia-reperfusion was induced in knockout mice 2 days after intrarenal injection of saline or a lentivirus encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or EGFP-human-A(1)AR. We found that the latter procedure induced a robust expression of the reporter protein in the kidneys of knockout mice. Mice with kidney-specific human-A(1)AR reconstitution had significantly lower plasma creatinine, tubular necrosis, apoptosis, and tubular inflammation as evidenced by decreased leukocyte infiltration, pro-inflammatory cytokine, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in the kidney following injury compared to mice injected with saline or the control lentivirus. Additionally, there were marked disruptions of the proximal tubule epithelial filamentous (F)-actin cytoskeleton in both sets of control mice upon renal injury, whereas the reconstituted mice had better preservation of the renal tubule actin cytoskeleton, which co-localized with the human-A(1)ARs. Consistent with reduced renal injury, there was a significant increase in heat shock protein-27 expression, also co-localizing with the preserved F-actin cytoskeleton. Our findings suggest that selective expression of cytoprotective A(1)ARs in the kidney can attenuate renal injury.

Guanosine, a guanine-based purine nucleoside, has been described as a neuromodulator that exerts neuroprotective effects in animal and cellular ischemia models. However, guanosine's exact mechanism of action and molecular targets have not yet been identified. Here, we aimed to elucidate a role of adenosine receptors (ARs) in mediating guanosine effects. We investigated the neuroprotective effects of guanosine in hippocampal slices from A2AR-deficient mice (A2AR-/-) subjected to oxygen/glucose deprivation (OGD). Next, we assessed guanosine binding at ARs taking advantage of a fluorescent-selective A2AR antagonist (MRS7396) which could engage in a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) process with NanoLuc-tagged A2AR. Next, we evaluated functional AR activation by determining cAMP and calcium accumulation. Finally, we assessed the impact of A1R and A2AR co-expression in guanosine-mediated impedance responses in living cells. Guanosine prevented the reduction of cellular viability and increased reactive oxygen species generation induced by OGD in hippocampal slices from wild-type, but not from A2AR-/- mice. Notably, while guanosine was not able to modify MRS7396 binding to A2AR-expressing cells, a partial blockade was observed in cells co-expressing A1R and A2AR. The relevance of the A1R and A2AR interaction in guanosine effects was further substantiated by means of functional assays (i.e., cAMP and calcium determinations), since guanosine only blocked A2AR agonist-mediated effects in doubly expressing A1R and A2AR cells. Interestingly, while guanosine did not affect A1R/A2AR heteromer formation, it reduced A2AR agonist-mediated cell impedance responses. Our results indicate that guanosine-induced effects may require both A1R and A2AR co-expression, thus identifying a molecular substrate that may allow fine tuning of guanosine-mediated responses.

1. Adipocyte A(1)-adenosine receptors (A(1) AdoR) tonically inhibit adenylyl cyclase and lipolysis. Three potential explanations for tonic activity of A(1)AdoR of rat epididymal adipocytes were investigated: high affinity of adenosine for the receptor, efficient coupling of receptor activation to response, and spontaneous activity of the receptor in the absence of agonist. 2. The affinity of adenosine for the adipocyte A(1)AdoR was determined as 4.6 microM by analysis of effects of an irreversible receptor antagonist on agonist concentration-response relationships. In contrast, the potency of adenosine to decrease cyclic AMP in isolated adipocytes was 1.4 nM. 3. Occupancy by agonist of the A(1)AdoR was efficiently coupled to functional response (decrease of adipocyte cyclic AMP content). Activation by adenosine of less than 1% of A(1)AdoRs caused a near-maximal decrease of cyclic AMP in adipocytes. Thus the receptor reserve for adenosine to decrease cyclic AMP content of adipocytes was greater than 99%. 4. Affinities and receptor reserves for other A(1)AdoR agonists were determined. Agonists appeared to differ more in their affinity for the receptor than in their intrinsic efficacy to activate it. 5. A(1)AdoRs were inactive in the absence of agonist. 6. It is concluded that adipocyte A(1)AdoR are tonically activated by endogenous adenosine at nanomolar concentrations. The expression of a high density of A(1)AdoR that are efficiently coupled to a functional response enables the adipocyte to respond with high sensitivity to the low-affinity agonist, adenosine. Adipocytes may be a model for cells whose functions are tonically modulated by adenosine present in the interstitium of well-oxygenated tissues.

The neurochemical effects of adenosine signaling in small-fiber neuropathy leading to neuropathic pain are yet to be explored in a direct manner. This study examined this system at the level of ligand (through the ectonucleotidase activity of prostatic acid phosphatase [PAP]) and adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs) in resiniferatoxin (RTX) neuropathy, a peripheral neurodegenerative disorder that specifically affects nociceptive nerves expressing transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1). We conducted immunohistochemistry on dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, high-performance liquid chromatography for functional assays, and pharmacological interventions to alter PAP and A1Rs in mice with RTX neuropathy. In DRG of RTX neuropathy, PAP(+) neurons were reduced compared with vehicle-treated mice (P = 0.002). Functionally, PAP ectonucleotidase activity was consequently reduced (ie, the content of adenosine in DRG, P = 0.012). PAP(+) neuronal density was correlated with the degree of mechanical allodynia, which was reversed by intrathecal (i.t.) lumbar puncture injection of recombinant PAP with a dose-dependent effect. Furthermore, A1Rs were downregulated (P = 0.002), and this downregulation was colocalized with the TRPV1 receptor (31.0% ± 2.8%). Mechanical allodynia was attenuated in a dose-dependent response by i.t. injection of the A1R ligand, adenosine; however, no analgesia was evident when an exogenous adenosine was blocked by A1R antagonist. This study demonstrated dual mechanisms of neuropathic pain in TRPV1-induced neuropathy, involving a reduced adenosine system at both the ligand (adenosine) and receptor (A1Rs) levels.

Receptor internalization in response to prolonged agonist treatment is an important regulator of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) function. The adenosine A1 receptor (A1AR) is one of the adenosine receptor family of GPCRs, and evidence for its agonist-induced internalization is equivocal. The recently developed NanoBiT technology uses split NanoLuc Luciferase to monitor changes in protein interactions. We have modified the human A1AR on the N-terminus with the small high-affinity HiBiT tag. In the presence of the large NanoLuc subunit (LgBiT), complementation occurs, reconstituting a full-length functional NanoLuc Luciferase. Here, we have used complemented luminescence to monitor the internalization of the A1AR in living HEK293 cells. Agonist treatment resulted in a robust decrease in cell-surface luminescence, indicating an increase in A1AR internalization. These responses were inhibited by the A1AR-selective antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), with an antagonist affinity that closely matched that measured using ligand binding with a fluorescent A1 receptor antagonist (CA200645). The agonist potencies for inducing A1AR internalization were very similar to the affinities previously determined by ligand binding, suggesting little or no amplification of the internalization response. By complementing the HiBiT tag to exogenous purified LgBiT, it was also possible to perform NanoBRET ligand-binding experiments using HiBiT-A1AR. This study demonstrates the use of NanoBiT technology to monitor internalization of the A1AR and offers the potential to combine these experiments with NanoBRET ligand-binding assays.

We report the synthesis and biological evaluation of new derivatives of Capadenoson, a former drug candidate that was previously advanced to phase IIa clinical trials. 19 of the 20 ligands show an affinity below 100 nM at the human adenosine A1 receptor (hA1AR) and display a wide range of residence times at this target (from approx. 5 min (compound 10) up to 132 min (compound 5)). Structure-affinity and structure-kinetics relationships were established, and computational studies of a homology model of the hA1AR revealed crucial interactions for both the affinity and dissociation kinetics of this family of ligands. These results were also combined with global metrics (Ligand Efficiency, cLogP), showing the importance of binding kinetics as an additional way to better select a drug candidate amongst seemingly similar leads.

The role of adenosine (ADO) in the regulation of glucose homeostasis is not clear. In the current study, we used A1-ADO receptor (A1AR)-deficient mice to investigate the role of ADO/A1AR signaling for glucose homeostasis.

Background: The basolateral potassium channels play an important role in maintaining the membrane transport in the renal proximal tubules (PT) and adenosine receptors have been shown to regulate the trans-epithelial Na+ absorption in the PT. The aim of the present study is to explore whether adenosine also regulates the basolateral K+ channel of the PT and to determine the adenosine receptor type and the signaling pathway which mediates the effect of adenosine on the K+ channel. Methods: We have used the single channel recording to examine the basolateral K+ channel activity in the proximal tubules of the mouse kidney. All experiments were performed in cell-attached patches. Results: Single channel recording has detected a 50 pS inwardly-rectifying K+ channel with high channel open probability and this 50 pS K+ channel is a predominant type K+ channel in the basolateral membrane of the mouse PT. Adding adenosine increased 50 pS K+ channel activity in cell-attached patches, defined by NPo (a product of channel Numbers and Open Probability). The adenosine-induced stimulation of the 50 pS K+ channel was absent in the PT pretreated with DPCPX, a selective inhibitor of adenosine A1 receptor. In contrast, adenosine was still able to stimulate the 50 pS K+ channel in the PT pretreated with CP-66713, a selective adenosine A2 receptor antagonist. This suggests that the stimulatory effect of adenosine on the 50 pS K+ channel of the PT was mediated by adenosine-A1 receptor. Moreover, the effect of adenosine on the 50 pS K+ channel was blocked in the PT pretreated with U-73122 or Calphostin C, suggesting that adenosine-induced stimulation of the 50 pS K+ channels of the PT was due to the activation of phospholipase C (PLC) and protein kinase C (PKC) pathway. In contrast, the inhibition of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) with AACOCF3 or inhibition of protein kinase A (PKA) with H8 failed to block the adenosine-induced stimulation of the 50 pS K+ channel of the PT. Conclusion: We conclude that adenosine activates the 50 pS K+ channels in the basolateral membrane of PT via adenosine-A1 receptor. Furthermore, the effect of adenosine on the 50 pS K+ channel is mediated by PLC-PKC signaling pathway.

Light induced retinal degeneration (LIRD) is a useful model that resembles human retinal degenerative diseases. The modulation of adenosine A1 receptor is neuroprotective in different models of retinal injury. The aim of this work was to evaluate the potential neuroprotective effect of the modulation of A1 receptor in LIRD. The eyes of rats intravitreally injected with N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), an A1 agonist, which were later subjected to continuous illumination (CI) for 24 h, showed retinas with a lower number of apoptotic nuclei and a decrease of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) immunoreactive area than controls. Lower levels of activated Caspase 3 and GFAP were demonstrated by Western Blot (WB) in treated animals. Also a decrease of iNOS, TNFα and GFAP mRNA was demonstrated by RT-PCR. A decrease of Iba 1+/MHC-II+ reactive microglial cells was shown by immunohistochemistry. Electroretinograms (ERG) showed higher amplitudes of a-wave, b-wave and oscillatory potentials after CI compared to controls. Conversely, the eyes of rats intravitreally injected with dipropylcyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), an A1 antagonist, and subjected to CI for 24 h, showed retinas with a higher number of apoptotic nuclei and an increase of GFAP immunoreactive area compared to controls. Also, higher levels of activated Caspase 3 and GFAP were demonstrated by Western Blot. The mRNA levels of iNOS, nNOS and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNFα) were not modified by DPCPX treatment. An increase of Iba 1+/MHC-II+ reactive microglial cells was shown by immunohistochemistry. ERG showed that the amplitudes of a-wave, b-wave, and oscillatory potentials after CI were similar to control values. A single pharmacological intervention prior illumination stress was able to swing retinal fate in opposite directions: CPA was neuroprotective, while DPCPX worsened retinal damage. In summary, A1 receptor agonism is a plausible neuroprotective strategy in LIRD.

Imaging of cerebral A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)AR) with positron emission tomography (PET) has recently become available for neurological research. To date, it has still not been unraveled if there is a valid reference region without specific radioligand binding that may be used to improve image quantification. We conducted in vivo displacement studies in humans to elucidate this important question using the A(1)AR ligand [(18)F]CPFPX.

Adenosine acts as a powerful signaling molecule via four distinct G protein-coupled receptors, designated A1, A2A, A2B and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs). A2A and A2B ARs are Gs-coupled, while A1 and A3 ARs inhibit cAMP production via Gi proteins. Antagonists for A1 and A3 ARs may be useful for the treatment of (neuro)inflammatory diseases including acute kidney injury and kidney failure, pulmonary diseases, and Alzheimer's disease. In the present study, we optimized the versatile 2-amino-4-phenylthiazole scaffold by introducing substituents at N2 and C5 to obtain A1 and A3 AR antagonists including dual-target compounds. Selective A1 antagonists with (sub)nanomolar potency were produced, e.g. 11 and 13. These compounds showed species differences being significantly more potent at the rat as compared to the human A1 AR, and were characterized as inverse agonists. Several potent and selective A3 AR antagonists, e.g. 7, 8, 17 and 22 (Ki values of 5-9 nM at the human A3 AR) were prepared, which were much less potent at the rat orthologue. Moreover, dual A1/A3 antagonists (10, 18) were developed showing Ki values between 8 and 42 nM. Docking and molecule dynamic simulation studies using the crystal structure of the A1 AR and a homology model of the A3 AR were performed to rationalize the observed structure-activity relationships.

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) present specific activation pathways and signaling among receptor subtypes. Hence, an extensive knowledge of the structural dynamics of the receptor is critical for the development of therapeutics. Here, we target the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R), for which a negligible number of drugs have been approved. We combine molecular dynamics simulations, enhanced sampling techniques, network theory and pocket detection to decipher the activation pathway of A1R, decode the allosteric networks and identify transient pockets. The A1R activation pathway reveal hidden intermediate and pre-active states together with the inactive and fully-active states observed experimentally. The protein energy networks computed throughout these conformational states successfully unravel the extra and intracellular allosteric centers and the communication pathways that couples them. We observe that the allosteric networks are dynamic, being increased along activation and fine-tuned in presence of the trimeric G-proteins. Overlap of transient pockets and energy networks uncover how the allosteric coupling between pockets and distinct functional regions of the receptor is altered along activation. By an in-depth analysis of the bridge between activation pathway, energy networks and transient pockets, we provide a further understanding of A1R. This information can be useful to ease the design of allosteric modulators for A1R.

Intravenous adenosine induces temporary bradycardia. This is due to the activation of extracellular adenosine receptors (ARs). While adenosine can signal through any of four ARs (A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, A3AR), previous ex vivo studies implicated the A1AR in the heart-rate slowing effects. Here, we used comparative genetic in vivo studies to address the contribution of individual ARs to the heart-rate slowing effects of intravascular adenosine.

The adenosine A1 receptor (A1-AR) is a G-protein-coupled receptor that plays a vital role in cardiac, renal, and neuronal processes but remains poorly targeted by current drugs. We determined a 3.2 Å crystal structure of the A1-AR bound to the selective covalent antagonist, DU172, and identified striking differences to the previously solved adenosine A2A receptor (A2A-AR) structure. Mutational and computational analysis of A1-AR revealed a distinct conformation of the second extracellular loop and a wider extracellular cavity with a secondary binding pocket that can accommodate orthosteric and allosteric ligands. We propose that conformational differences in these regions, rather than amino-acid divergence, underlie drug selectivity between these adenosine receptor subtypes. Our findings provide a molecular basis for AR subtype selectivity with implications for understanding the mechanisms governing allosteric modulation of these receptors, allowing the design of more selective agents for the treatment of ischemia-reperfusion injury, renal pathologies, and neuropathic pain.

In the brain, purines such as ATP and adenosine can function as neurotransmitters and co-transmitters, or serve as signals in neuron-glial interactions. In thalamocortical (TC) projections to sensory cortex, adenosine functions as a negative regulator of glutamate release via activation of the presynaptic adenosine A1 receptor (A1 R). In the auditory forebrain, restriction of A1 R-adenosine signaling in medial geniculate (MG) neurons is sufficient to extend LTP, LTD, and tonotopic map plasticity in adult mice for months beyond the critical period. Interfering with adenosine signaling in primary auditory cortex (A1) does not contribute to these forms of plasticity, suggesting regional differences in the roles of A1 R-mediated adenosine signaling in the forebrain. To advance understanding of the circuitry, in situ hybridization was used to localize neuronal and glial cell types in the auditory forebrain that express A1 R transcripts (Adora1), based on co-expression with cell-specific markers for neuronal and glial subtypes. In A1, Adora1 transcripts were concentrated in L3/4 and L6 of glutamatergic neurons. Subpopulations of GABAergic neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia expressed lower levels of Adora1. In MG, Adora1 was expressed by glutamatergic neurons in all divisions, and subpopulations of all glial classes. The collective findings imply that A1 R-mediated signaling broadly extends to all subdivisions of auditory cortex and MG. Selective expression by neuronal and glial subpopulations suggests that experimental manipulations of A1 R-adenosine signaling could impact several cell types, depending on their location. Strategies to target Adora1 in specific cell types can be developed from the data generated here. Anat Rec, 301:1882-1905, 2018. © 2018 The Authors. The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Anatomists.

Immunolabeling for adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs) is high in hippocampal area CA2 in adult rats, and the potentiating effects of caffeine or other A1R-selective antagonists on synaptic responses are particularly robust at Schaffer collateral synapses in CA2. Interestingly, the pronounced staining for A1Rs in CA2 is not apparent until rats are 4 weeks old, suggesting that developmental changes other than receptor distribution underlie the sensitivity of CA2 synapses to A1R antagonists in young animals. To evaluate the role of A1R-mediated postsynaptic signals at these synapses, we tested whether A1R agonists regulate synaptic transmission at Schaffer collateral inputs to CA2 and CA1. We found that the selective A1R agonist CCPA caused a lasting depression of synaptic responses in both CA2 and CA1 neurons in slices obtained from juvenile rats (P14), but that the effect was observed only in CA2 in slices prepared from adult animals (~P70). Interestingly, blocking phosphodiesterase activity with rolipram inhibited the CCPA-induced depression in CA1, but not in CA2, indicative of robust phosphodiesterase activity in CA1 neurons. Likewise, synaptic responses in CA2 and CA1 differed in their sensitivity to the adenylyl cyclase activator, forskolin, in that it increased synaptic transmission in CA2, but had little effect in CA1. These findings suggest that the A1R-mediated synaptic depression tracks the postnatal development of immunolabeling for A1Rs and that the enhanced sensitivity to antagonists in CA2 at young ages is likely due to robust adenylyl cyclase activity and weak phosphodiesterase activity rather than to enrichment of A1Rs.

Tracer development for positron emission tomography (PET) requires thorough evaluation of pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and dosimetry of candidate radioligands in preclinical animal studies. Since variations in pharmacokinetics and metabolism of a compound occur in different species, careful selection of a suitable model species is mandatory to obtain valid data. This study focuses on species differences in the in vitro metabolism of three xanthine-derived ligands for the A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR), which, in their 18F-labeled form, can be used to image A1AR via PET. In vitro intrinsic clearance and metabolite profiles of 8-cyclopentyl-3-(3-fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine (CPFPX), an established A1AR-ligand, and two novel analogs, 8-cyclobutyl-3-(3-fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine (CBX) and 3-(3-fluoropropyl)-8-(1-methylcyclobutyl)-1-propylxanthine (MCBX), were determined in liver microsomes from humans and preclinical animal species. Molecular mechanisms leading to significant differences between human and animal metabolite profiles were also examined. The results revealed significant species differences regarding qualitative and quantitative aspects of microsomal metabolism. None of the tested animal species fully matched human microsomal metabolism of the three A1AR ligands. In conclusion, preclinical evaluation of xanthine-derived A1AR ligands should employ at least two animal species, preferably rodent and dog, to predict in vivo behavior in humans. Surprisingly, rhesus macaques appear unsuitable due to large differences in metabolic activity towards the test compounds.

Caffeine has been used as a first-line drug for treatment of apnea neonatorum for decades due to its high safety and effectiveness. Studies report that caffeine mainly acts as a blocker of Adenosine Receptors (ARs). However, the mechanism of caffeine in reducing apnea neonatorum in the central nervous system has not been fully explored. Medial parabrachial nucleus (MPB) is part of the respiratory center of the pons that may be related to the activity of caffeine. Previous studies have not explored the effect and mechanism of caffeine on MPB neurons. To elucidate this, the current study used antagonists of A1 and A2a receptors to mimic the effect of caffeine in MPB of mice in vitro using the patch-clamp technique. The firing rates and spontaneous post-synaptic currents were recorded. The findings of the study showed that caffeine excited MPB neurons. Notably, the adenosine A1R antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethyl-xanthine (CPT) but not the adenosine A2aR antagonist Istradefylline (KW6002) mimicked the exciting effect of caffeine, implying that caffeine excited MPB neurons in mice by blocking A1Rs. Further, the results indicated that caffeine could increase efficiency of synaptic transmission to excite MPB neurons. These findings suggest that A1Rs in MPB may be potential targets for caffeine in reducing apnea neonatorum.

Some behavioral and biochemical effects of the systemically administered adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680) in rats are potentiated by adenosine A(1) receptor agonists and counteracted by dopamine D2 receptor agonists. In the present study we compared potentiating and antagonistic interactions between CGS 21680 and adenosine A(1) and dopamine D2 receptor agonists on motor activity and on cardiovascular responses (arterial blood pressure and heart rate). The motor-depressant effects produced by CGS 21680 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) were potentiated by the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) and counteracted by the dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). In contrast, neither CPA nor quinpirole significantly modified the decrease in arterial pressure or the increase in heart rate induced by CGS 21680. However, the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist 3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-8-(m-methoxystyryl)-7-methyl-1-propargylxanthine phosphate disodium salt (MSX-3, 3 mg/kg, i.p.) counteracted both the motor-depressant and cardiovascular effects of CGS 21680. Therefore, the effects of the systemically administered adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 on cardiovascular function, in contrast to its effects on motor behavior, appear to be independent of the effects of adenosine A(1) and dopamine D2 receptor activity.

We report the design, synthesis, and validation of the novel compound photocaged N6-cyclopentyladenosine (cCPA) to achieve precisely localized and timed release of the parent adenosine A1 receptor agonist CPA using 405 nm light. Gi protein-coupled A1 receptors (A1Rs) modulate neurotransmission via pre- and post-synaptic routes. The dynamics of the CPA-mediated effect on neurotransmission, characterized by fast activation and slow recovery, make it possible to implement a closed-loop control paradigm. The strength of neurotransmission is monitored as the amplitude of stimulus-evoked local field potentials. It is used for feedback control of light to release CPA. This system makes it possible to regulate neurotransmission to a pre-defined level in acute hippocampal brain slices incubated with 3 µM cCPA. This novel approach of closed-loop photopharmacology holds therapeutic potential for fine-tuned control of neurotransmission in diseases associated with neuronal hyperexcitability.