Searching across hundreds of databases

Our searching services are busy right now. Your search will reload in five seconds.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

This service exclusively searches for literature that cites resources. Please be aware that the total number of searchable documents is limited to those containing RRIDs and does not include all open-access literature.

Search

Type in a keyword to search

On page 1 showing 1 ~ 5 papers out of 5 papers

Evaluation of a panel of antibodies for the immunohistochemical identification of immune cells in paraffin-embedded lymphoid tissues of new- and old-world camelids.

  • Ann-Kathrin Uhde‎ et al.
  • Veterinary immunology and immunopathology‎
  • 2017‎

Different species of camelids play an important role in the epidemiology of various emerging infectious diseases such as Middle East respiratory syndrome. For precise investigations of the immunopathogenesis in these host species, appropriate immunohistochemical markers are highly needed in order to phenotype distinct immune cells populations in camelids. So far, specific immunohistochemical markers for camelid immune cells are rarely commercially available, and cross-reactivity studies are restricted to the use of frozen dromedary tissues. To bridge this gap, 14 commercially available primary antibodies were tested for their suitability to demonstrate immune cell populations on formalin fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections of dromedaries, Bactrian camels, llamas, and alpacas in the present study. Out of these, 9 antibodies directed against CD3, CD20, CD79α, HLA-DR, Iba-1, myeloid/histiocyte antigen, CD204, CD208, and CD68 antigen exhibited distinct immunoreaction patterns to certain camelid immune cell subsets. The distribution of these antigens was comparatively evaluated in different anatomical compartments of thymus, spleen, mesenteric, and tracheobronchial lymph nodes. The presented results will provide a basis for further investigations in camelids, especially with respect to the role of the immune response in certain infectious diseases, which harbor a considerable risk to spill over to other species.


Compromised antigen binding and signaling interfere with bispecific CD19 and CD79a chimeric antigen receptor function.

  • Isabel Leung‎ et al.
  • Blood advances‎
  • 2023‎

Therapy with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has transformed the treatment of advanced B-cell malignancies. However, loss of or low antigen expression can enable tumor escape and limit the duration of responses achieved with CAR T-cell therapy. Engineering bispecific CAR T cells that target 2 tumor antigens could overcome antigen-negative escape. We found that CD79a and b, which are heterodimeric components of the B-cell receptor, were expressed on 84.3% of lymphoma cases using immunohistochemistry, and 87.3% of CD79ab-positive tumors also coexpressed CD19. We generated 3 bispecific permutations: tandem, bicistronic, and pooled products of CD79a-CD19 or CD79b-CD19 CAR T cells and showed that bispecific CAR T cells prevented the outgrowth of antigen-negative cells in a CD19-loss lymphoma xenograft model. However, tandem and bicistronic CAR T cells were less effective than monospecific CD19 or CD79a CAR T cells for the treatment of tumors that only expressed CD19 or CD79, respectively. When compared with monospecific CAR T cells, T cells expressing a tandem CAR exhibited reduced binding of each target antigen, and T cells expressing a bicistronic CAR vector exhibited reduced phosphorylation of downstream CAR signaling molecules. Our study showed that despite added specificity, tandem and bicistronic CAR T cells exhibit different defects that impair recognition of tumor cells expressing a single antigen. Our data provide support for targeting multiple B-cell antigens to improve efficacy and identify areas for improvement in bispecific receptor designs.


Comprehensive cell surface protein profiling of human mesenchymal stromal cells from peritoneal dialysis effluent and comparison with those from human bone marrow and adipose tissue.

  • Ganggang Shi‎ et al.
  • Human cell‎
  • 2023‎

Peritoneal mesenchymal stromal cells (pMSCs) are isolated from peritoneal dialysis (PD) effluent, and treatment with the pMSCs reduces peritoneal membrane injury in rat model of PD. This study was designed to verify the identity of the pMSCs. pMSCs were grown in plastic dishes for 4-7 passages, and their cell surface phenotype was examined by staining with a panel of 242 antibodies. The positive stain of each target protein was determined by an increase in fluorescence intensity as compared with isotype controls in flow cytometrical analysis. Here, we showed that pMSCs predominantly expressed CD9, CD26, CD29, CD42a, CD44, CD46, CD47, CD49b, CD49c, CD49e, CD54, CD55, CD57, CD59, CD63, CD71, CD73, CD81, CD90, CD98, CD147, CD151, CD200, CD201, β2-micoglobulin, epithelial growth factor receptor, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class 1, and, to a lesser extent, CD31, CD45RO, CD49a, CD49f, CD50, CD58, CD61, CD105, CD164, and CD166. These cells lacked expression of most hematopoietic markers such as CD11b, CD14, CD19, CD34, CD40, CD80, CD79, CD86, and HLA-DR. There was 38.55% difference in the expression of 83 surface proteins between bone marrow (BM)-derived MSCs and pMSCs, and 14.1% in the expression of 242 proteins between adipose tissue (AT)-derived MSCs and pMSCs. The BM-MSCs but not both AT-MSCs and pMSCs express cytokine receptors (IFNγR, TNFI/IIR, IL-1R, IL-4R, IL-6R, and IL-7R). In conclusion, pMSCs exhibited a typical cell surface phenotype of MSCs, which was not the same as on BM-MSCs or AT-MSCs, suggesting that the pMSCs may represent a different MSC lineage from peritoneal cavity.


Immunohistochemistry for the detection of neural and inflammatory cells in equine brain tissue.

  • Gretchen H Delcambre‎ et al.
  • PeerJ‎
  • 2016‎

Phenotypic characterization of cellular responses in equine infectious encephalitides has had limited description of both peripheral and resident cell populations in central nervous system (CNS) tissues due to limited species-specific reagents that react with formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE). This study identified a set of antibodies for investigating the immunopathology of infectious CNS diseases in horses. Multiple commercially available staining reagents and antibodies derived from antigens of various species for manual immunohistochemistry (IHC) were screened. Several techniques and reagents for heat-induced antigen retrieval, non-specific protein blocking, endogenous peroxidase blocking, and visualization-detection systems were tested during IHC protocol development. Boiling of slides in a low pH, citrate-based buffer solution in a double-boiler system was most consistent for epitope retrieval. Pressure-cooking, microwaving, high pH buffers, and proteinase K solutions often resulted in tissue disruption or no reactivity. Optimal blocking reagents and concentrations of each working antibody were determined. Ultimately, a set of monoclonal (mAb) and polyclonal antibodies (pAb) were identified for CD3(+) (pAb A0452, Dako) T-lymphocytes, CD79αcy(+) B-lymphocytes (mAb HM57, Dako), macrophages (mAb MAC387, Leica), NF-H(+) neurons (mAb NAP4, EnCor Biotechnology), microglia/macrophage (pAb Iba-1, Wako), and GFAP(+) astrocytes (mAb 5C10, EnCor Biotechnology). In paraffin embedded tissues, mAbs and pAbs derived from human and swine antigens were very successful at binding equine tissue targets. Individual, optimized protocols are provided for each positively reactive antibody for analyzing equine neuroinflammatory disease histopathology.


Scalable Production of Equine Platelet Lysate for Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Culture.

  • A Hagen‎ et al.
  • Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology‎
  • 2020‎

Translation of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-based therapies is advancing in human and veterinary medicine. One critical issue is the in vitro culture of MSC before clinical use. Using fetal bovine serum (FBS) as supplement to the basal medium is still the gold standard for cultivation of many cell types including equine MSC. Alternatives are being explored, with substantial success using platelet lysate-supplemented media for human MSC. However, progress lags behind in the veterinary field. The aim of this study was to establish a scalable protocol for equine platelet lysate (ePL) production and to test the ePL in equine MSC culture. Whole blood was harvested into blood collection bags from 20 healthy horses. After checking sample materials for pathogen contamination, samples from 19 animals were included. Platelet concentrates were prepared using a buffy coat method. Platelets, platelet-derived growth factor BB, and transforming growth factor β1 concentrations were increased in the concentrates compared with whole blood or serum (p < 0.05), while white blood cells were reduced (p < 0.05). The concentrates were lysed using freeze/thaw cycles, which eliminated the cells while growth factor concentrations were maintained. Donor age negatively correlated with platelet and growth factor concentrations after processing (p < 0.05). Finally, all lysates were pooled and the ePL was evaluated as culture medium supplement in comparison with FBS, using adipose-derived MSC from four unrelated donor horses. MSC proliferated well in 10% FBS as well as in 10% ePL. However, using 5 or 2.5% ePL entailed highly inconsistent proliferation or loss of proliferation, with significant differences in generation times and confluencies (p < 0.05). MSC expressed the surface antigens CD90, CD44, and CD29, but CD73 and CD105 detection was low in all culture media. Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation led to similar results in MSC from different culture media. The buffy coat method is useful to produce equine platelet concentrate with increased platelet and reduced white blood cell content in large scales. The ePL obtained supports MSC expansion similar as FBS when used at the same concentration (10%). Further investigations into equine MSC functionality in culture with ePL should follow.


  1. SciCrunch.org Resources

    Welcome to the FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org Resources search. From here you can search through a compilation of resources used by FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org and see how data is organized within our community.

  2. Navigation

    You are currently on the Community Resources tab looking through categories and sources that FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org has compiled. You can navigate through those categories from here or change to a different tab to execute your search through. Each tab gives a different perspective on data.

  3. Logging in and Registering

    If you have an account on FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org then you can log in from here to get additional features in FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org such as Collections, Saved Searches, and managing Resources.

  4. Searching

    Here is the search term that is being executed, you can type in anything you want to search for. Some tips to help searching:

    1. Use quotes around phrases you want to match exactly
    2. You can manually AND and OR terms to change how we search between words
    3. You can add "-" to terms to make sure no results return with that term in them (ex. Cerebellum -CA1)
    4. You can add "+" to terms to require they be in the data
    5. Using autocomplete specifies which branch of our semantics you with to search and can help refine your search
  5. Save Your Search

    You can save any searches you perform for quick access to later from here.

  6. Query Expansion

    We recognized your search term and included synonyms and inferred terms along side your term to help get the data you are looking for.

  7. Collections

    If you are logged into FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org you can add data records to your collections to create custom spreadsheets across multiple sources of data.

  8. Facets

    Here are the facets that you can filter your papers by.

  9. Options

    From here we'll present any options for the literature, such as exporting your current results.

  10. Further Questions

    If you have any further questions please check out our FAQs Page to ask questions and see our tutorials. Click this button to view this tutorial again.

Publications Per Year

X

Year:

Count: