Searching across hundreds of databases

Our searching services are busy right now. Your search will reload in five seconds.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

This service exclusively searches for literature that cites resources. Please be aware that the total number of searchable documents is limited to those containing RRIDs and does not include all open-access literature.

Search

Type in a keyword to search

On page 1 showing 1 ~ 4 papers out of 4 papers

Do adrenergic alpha-antagonists increase the risk of poor cardiovascular outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • José Pedro Sousa‎ et al.
  • ESC heart failure‎
  • 2022‎

Due to concerns regarding neurohormonal activation and fluid retention, adrenergic alpha-1 receptor antagonists (A1Bs) are generally avoided in the setting of heart disease, namely, symptomatic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, this contraindication is mainly supported by ancient studies, having recently been challenged by newer ones. We aim to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis aimed at ascertaining the extent to which A1Bs might influence cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science for both prospective and retrospective studies, published until 1 December 2020, addressing the impact of A1Bs on both clinical outcomes-namely, acute heart failure (AHF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), CV and all-cause mortality-and on CV surrogate measures, specifically left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and exercise tolerance, by means of exercise duration. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and studies including only HF patients were further investigated separately. Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) were pooled using traditional meta-analytic techniques, under a random-effects model. A record was registered in PROSPERO database, with the code number CRD42020181804. Fifteen RCTs, three non-randomized prospective and two retrospective studies, encompassing 32 851, 19 287, and 71 600 patients, respectively, were deemed eligible; 62 256 patients were allocated to A1B, on the basis of multiple clinical indications: chronic HF itself [14 studies, with 72 558 patients, including seven studies with 850 HFrEF or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) patients], arterial hypertension (four studies, with 44 184 patients) and low urinary tract symptoms (two studies, with 6996 patients). There were 25 998 AHF events, 1325 ACS episodes, 955 CV deaths and 33 567 all-cause deaths. When considering only RCTs, A1Bs were, indeed, found to increase AHF risk (OR 1.78, [1.46, 2.16] 95% CI, P < 0.00001, i2 2%), although displaying no significant effect on neither ACS nor CV or all-cause mortality rates (OR 1.02, [0.91, 1.15] 95% CI, i2 0%; OR 0.95, [0.47, 1.91] 95% CI, i2 17%; OR 1.1, [0.84, 1.43] 95% CI, i2 17%, respectively). Besides, when only HF patients were evaluated, A1Bs revealed themselves neutral towards not only ACS, CV, and all-cause mortality events (OR 0.49, [0.1, 2.47] 95% CI, i2 0%; OR 0.7, [0.21, 2.31] 95% CI, i2 21%; OR 1.09, [0.53, 2.23] 95% CI, i2 17%, respectively), but also AHF (OR 1.13, [0.66, 1.92] 95% CI, i2 0%). As for HFrEF and HFmrEF, A1Bs were found to exert a similarly inconsequential effect on AHF rates (OR 1.01, [0.5-2.05] 95% CI, i2 6%). Likewise, LVEF was not significantly influenced by A1Bs (MD 1.66, [-2.18, 5.50] 95% CI, i2 58%). Most strikingly, exercise tolerance was higher in those under this drug class (MD 139.16, [65.52, 212.8] 95% CI, P < 0.001, i2 26%). A1Bs do not seem to exert a negative influence on the prognosis of HF-and even of HFrEF-patients, thus contradicting currently held views. These drugs' impact on other major CV outcomes also appear trivial and they may even increment exercise tolerance.


Medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones: Analysing the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysis of powered double-blinded randomised controlled trials.

  • Tarik Amer‎ et al.
  • Arab journal of urology‎
  • 2017‎

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of medical expulsive therapy (MET) in low risk of bias (RoB) randomised controlled trials (RCTs).


Perturbation of tyraminergic/octopaminergic function inhibits oviposition in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.

  • Raquel Cossío-Bayúgar‎ et al.
  • Journal of insect physiology‎
  • 2012‎

The cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus, is one of the most damaging livestock ectoparasites. Tropical tick infestation limits the introduction of high-yield bovine varieties because they do not have immunity to the diseases transmitted by these ectoparasites. This tick is usually controlled with chemical acaricides but their indiscriminate use has created resistant populations. The discovery of new molecules that can be used for tick control is urgent. Based on the knowledge that octopamine, a biogenic amine analog to epinephrine, is central to the regulation of oviposition in several studied arthropods and that an imbalance in octopamine release causes sterility in a Drosophila model. Tyramine, octopamine and epinastine and 83 adrenergic compounds classified by their effect in the vertebrate systems were screened for their ability to block oviposition in Rhipicephalus microplus. Of these molecules, we found that 10 alpha-agonists, 3 alpha-antagonists, 5 beta-adrenergic agonists, 7 beta-antagonists and Norepinephrine were able to inhibit oviposition in this tick at pharmacological concentrations. Surprisingly, tyramine appears to be more potent than octopamine. The probable physiological causes of this inhibition are discussed. Our results suggest that although there are alpha adrenergic-like receptors in the tick, they do not behave in a manner completely analogous to their vertebrate counterparts.


Changing trends in antihypertensive therapy in two New England communities during the 1980s.

  • A L Hume‎ et al.
  • Pharmacotherapy‎
  • 1993‎

The prevalence rates and correlates of antihypertensive drug use among individuals with hypertension were determined using data derived from five biennial population-based surveys conducted between 1981 and 1990 in two New England communities. Point prevalence estimates were determined for nine categories of antihypertensive agents at five time points, and were analyzed by age and sex using multiple logistic regression. In the first cross-sectional survey, the prevalence of use per 1000 individuals with hypertension was 235.4 for diuretics, 57.1 for beta-blockers, 65.5 for combination products, 29.2 for central alpha-agonists, 2.8 for peripheral alpha-antagonists, and 8.4 each for adrenergic blockers and direct vasodilators. The prevalence rates for calcium channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors increased sharply between the third and fourth survey cycles. Significant age- and sex-related differences in antihypertensive use were detected.


  1. SciCrunch.org Resources

    Welcome to the FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org Resources search. From here you can search through a compilation of resources used by FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org and see how data is organized within our community.

  2. Navigation

    You are currently on the Community Resources tab looking through categories and sources that FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org has compiled. You can navigate through those categories from here or change to a different tab to execute your search through. Each tab gives a different perspective on data.

  3. Logging in and Registering

    If you have an account on FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org then you can log in from here to get additional features in FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org such as Collections, Saved Searches, and managing Resources.

  4. Searching

    Here is the search term that is being executed, you can type in anything you want to search for. Some tips to help searching:

    1. Use quotes around phrases you want to match exactly
    2. You can manually AND and OR terms to change how we search between words
    3. You can add "-" to terms to make sure no results return with that term in them (ex. Cerebellum -CA1)
    4. You can add "+" to terms to require they be in the data
    5. Using autocomplete specifies which branch of our semantics you with to search and can help refine your search
  5. Save Your Search

    You can save any searches you perform for quick access to later from here.

  6. Query Expansion

    We recognized your search term and included synonyms and inferred terms along side your term to help get the data you are looking for.

  7. Collections

    If you are logged into FDI Lab - SciCrunch.org you can add data records to your collections to create custom spreadsheets across multiple sources of data.

  8. Facets

    Here are the facets that you can filter your papers by.

  9. Options

    From here we'll present any options for the literature, such as exporting your current results.

  10. Further Questions

    If you have any further questions please check out our FAQs Page to ask questions and see our tutorials. Click this button to view this tutorial again.

Publications Per Year

X

Year:

Count: