SUMMARY: Limitations of genome sequencing techniques have led to dozens of assembly algorithms, none of which is perfect. A number of methods for comparing assemblers have been developed, but none is yet a recognized benchmark. Further, most existing methods for comparing assemblies are only applicable to new assemblies of finished genomes; the problem of evaluating assemblies of previously unsequenced species has not been adequately considered. Here, we present QUAST-a quality assessment tool for evaluating and comparing genome assemblies. This tool improves on leading assembly comparison software with new ideas and quality metrics. QUAST can evaluate assemblies both with a reference genome, as well as without a reference. QUAST produces many reports, summary tables and plots to help scientists in their research and in their publications. In this study, we used QUAST to compare several genome assemblers on three datasets. QUAST tables and plots for all of them are available in the Supplementary Material, and interactive versions of these reports are on the QUAST website. AVAILABILITY: http://bioinf.spbau.ru/quast . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Pubmed ID: 23422339 RIS Download
Mesh terms: Algorithms | Animals | Chromosome Mapping | Contig Mapping | Escherichia coli | Genome | Genomic Structural Variation | Genomics | Humans | Quality Control | Sequence Alignment | Sequence Analysis, DNA | Software
Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.