Preparing your results

Our searching services are busy right now. Your search will reload in five seconds.

X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

Correspondence of motivational enhancement treatment integrity ratings among therapists, supervisors, and observers.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19396649

This study examined the correspondence of treatment integrity ratings (adherence and competence) among community program therapists, supervisors, and observers for therapists who used motivational enhancement therapy (MET) within a National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network protocol. The results suggested there was reasonable agreement between the three groups of raters about the presence or absence of several fundamental MET strategies. Moreover, relative to observers, therapists and supervisors were more positive in their evaluations of the therapists' MET adherence and competence. These findings underscore the need for objective monitoring of therapists' performance when using empirically supported treatments and for adequately training therapists and supervisors to evaluate their treatment implementation in community programs, and are consistent with observations that different perspectives on the therapeutic process are not interchangeable.

Pubmed ID: 19396649 RIS Download

Mesh terms: Adult | Clinical Competence | Female | Guideline Adherence | Humans | Male | Motivation | Psychotherapy | Substance-Related Disorders | Videotape Recording

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.